https://nakamotostudies.org/ read some Satoshi... The #1 goal of Bitcoin was to strip power over money from governments and give it to the people of the world to govern as a whole.
If a government has less control over it's people(via various FIAT instruments) it makes that Nation STRONGER not weaker.
FED banks/fiat money are systems of control OVER Nations, they are anti-national. If Bitcoin replaced that system it'd give the people of various Nations control over their governments
Bitcoin does not give people control over governments. Im not sure how you see that it does. By using Bitcoin I have no greater say over what decisions any government makes.
As far as purpose - ignoring execution - how are FED banks/fiat systems any different than Bitcoin. They are a means of recording value across global economy. So yes, anti-national.
The proper place for the government is to be UNDER the Nation. The entire concept of the US constitution is to attempt to keep the government under the control of the Nation.
Call it whatever you want... When the people of a nation collectively organize and make decisions, its a government. Bitcoin takes power away from governments.
No way dude, uncensorable money/communication empowers people to better collectively organize and make decisions. How this is not self evident is beyond me.
Bitcoin Cash is you being your own bank. Government relies on fiat (gov decree) and inflation to exist. BCH eliminates these as possibilities: Uncontrollable and uncensorable.
Exactly, that would be the goal. Why do think the US elected a leader who's signature catch phrase is "YOU'RE FIRED"? Our Nation wants to fundamentally weaken the organizational body,