Create account

replied 2141d
There is no such thing as spam. If you pay for your TX, it is legit.
Nikamoto
replied 2140d
If a miner fill a block with random tx just to slow down the network it's a spam. 0 cost for the miner if he doesn't broadcast the tx first
replied 2140d
So, because people pay the post office to send me junk mail I don't get to call it junk mail?
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2140d
Is there money in that mail?
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2140d
Even if u send it without the fee. Bitcoin tx has only two characteristics: validity within miner's ruleset and economic feasibility determined by miner, sometimes 0-fee txs fit
replied 2140d
If it is a miner bloating their own blocks, it's spam.
replied 2140d
I mean, it's permissionless. I guess you can call it whatever you want, but when you start giving something negative names, you lean towards banning it next. Valid is Valid.
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2140d
Concept of spam doesn't apply to blockchains. E-mails are forced upon u - u've to collect everything to start discriminating, which is not the case with Bitcoin or other crypto
replied 2140d
Is the US or NATO at war when they do their war games? They are getting ready for future conflict. IN this case SV is getting ready for world adoption.
replied 2140d
LOL. They haven't even handled the accept-to-mempool limitation, which limits it to ~22mb sustained throughput. Simply raising the limit isn't an engineering feat.
cbeastsv
replied 2140d
If you are framing a problem and don't have a solution, then you don't really understand what you are talking about.
replied 2140d
What?
cbeastsv
replied 2140d
.