Memo - Post by SILENTSAM

SILENTSAM

replied 2271d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Sk8eM dUb

Globalization is fine. A bureaucracy picking winners and losers is counterproductive to fair global trade. It only props up the monopolies that are responsible for it's existence.

Then dont have a bureaucracy picking winners and losers in trade. Free trade would work better. The less restrictions on the movement of assets the better.

1 / 4

Sk8eM dUb

replied 2271d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Sounds like you're anti-sustainable development. Good job! https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
Welcome to being anti globalist!

SILENTSAM

replied 2270d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

Free trade is part of globalism. Free trade does not mean unsustainable.

Environmentalism is one area that free trade is less important of course.

Sk8eM dUb

replied 2270d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

"Sustainable development" has nothing to do with sustainability. If "free trade" is apart of globalism why doesn't the UN crack down on China?

SILENTSAM

replied 2270d

- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer

The UN has no power to crack down on anyone is the reason. The UN is not a global government.