Create account

replied 2050d
I'm not sure people would react well to a feature that allowed someone to be censored all the time. Especially on a platform that advertises itself as uncensorable :P
replied 2050d
Good point. Not sure what you want, uncensorable or community moderated. If someone keeps paying to keep an individual shut up on site, the "censored" memos can still be viewed onchain
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2050d
You might think that's hyperbole but I assure you it's not. In China you get special privileges via your improved social score for turning in political dissidents. Mob rule is not fun.
replied 2050d
Also, I doubt China is a good example for what I mean by community moderated. On memo, one turns nobody in to higher authority.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2050d
For now! Get a million people on here and see how every little rule you make effects things. Especially if there are whistleblowers and political dissidents.
replied 2050d
That sounds like fun! The other thing is, if you are so inclined, for a little $$$ you can also protect your favorite whistleblower from being silenced!
replied 2050d
A real marketplace of ideas. Of course there are a few on here that don't believe in free markets.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2050d
I rest my case
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2050d
North Korea(and other communist countries) are "community moderated". It's one way the dictators maintain control. You can make you own memo client, idk if anyone will use it though.
replied 2050d
No, I didn't mean "community moderated" as in N. Korea ;)