Uh, drawbacks are drawbacks. CashShuffle is less functional than a traditional mixer with no improvement in fungibility and obfuscation. Trustless doesn't make those issues go away.
I'd argue it does, by automatically shuffling your wallet we will have really big pools and the same amount of BCH issue wouldn't be problematic either if enough people participate
Completely agree. I imagine pools with hundreds of shufflers, and many users running bots to automatically shuffle UTXOs in the background. All with zero trust in a third party.
Bottom line is CashShuffle is not sufficient for fungibility and obfuscation in my opinion. Traditional mixers like coinmix.to are far more flexible and practical for the layman.
If you need to shuffle EXACTLY 0.10 BCH and don't mind waiting hours, encountering bugs with alpha software i suppose it's fine. To me, it's only less crappy than LN.
the drawbacks sound annoying when you are doing shuffling as an explicit action, but they are irrelevant if your wallet does it in the background without your participation
It has the ease of use and bugs of Lightning Network, and the transaction speed of 10 sat/byte BTC tx's in December.
Automatic shuffling isn't implemented in CashShuffle. It all is done manually in the plugin tab in Electron Cash. Aside from fixed amounts, high minimums etc. there are numerous issues
it can be added as a plugin is what is my point. the layman wouldn't have to understand anything, as it can be fully automated, which is only possible because it is trustless
You can't automate shuffling of all coins. CashShuffle does not allow you to use custom amounts. Only fixed presets. Doing otherwise breaks anonymity.
Plus, they'd need to understand plugins. Which most actual laymans don't. Operation of the wallet is advanced enough.
