First, this can all be done in a single post on BSV.
Second, nothing of what you say runs counter to the original article. You should re-read the article.
If you don't see the contradiction then you have a bulb in need of replacing.
I recommend anyone else reread the article and come to their own conclusions.
Excellent move using a wayback machine link. Of course, I suppose he could try to get them to remove it at some point. This is great comedy though.
Yes, an archiver that backs up to IPFS would be better. I'll have to have a look around whether such a thing exists.
Protip: Don't use BCH Chain memo or Twitter for long dialogue. Instead use Steemit, Medium, Honest Cash or BSV chain memo (far larger word-count).
Satoshi Re: Exchange Methods:
"LR and Pecunix have many established exchanges to paper currencies by various payment methods, and a number of vendors accept them as payment, [...]"
"[...] so an exchange link between Bitcoin and LR/Pecunix would give us 2nd-hop access to all that. The possibility to cash out through them would help support the value of bitcoins."
"Bitcoin has unique properties that would be complementary. LR/Pecunix are easy to spend anonymously, but hard to buy anonymously and not worth the trouble to buy in small amounts."
"Bitcoin, on the other hand, is easy to get in small amounts anonymously. It would be convenient to buy LR/Pecunix with bitcoins rather than through conventional payment methods."
"Most customers who convert to LR to buy something would probably ask the seller first if they accept Bitcoin, encouraging them to start accepting it."
First, this can all be done in a single post on BSV.
Second, nothing of what you say runs counter to the original article. You should re-read the article.
