How s2x fail if it had 95% signaling? An army of liars pretended they were the BTC community throughout social media. They claimed the community supported high fees, small blocks and a short delay until the arrival of
LN to provide scaling (for the primary use case of Bitcoin - p2p cash for the world). The real BTC community fell for the lie, believed they were a minority and gave up the fight for
the ticker (brand) and adoption we had spent years building. Later we found out the loss of the primary use case of Core's BTC (p2p cash for the world) was intentional and permanent.
LN is not intended to fix scaling for the people of the world The real community never wanted high fees small blocks and the loss of BTC's primary use case. They still do not want that
Actually, everyone who still owns any amount of BTC basically states that they are OK with the BlockstreamCore retardation, including the high fees and general dysfunctionality.
We can hate on BlockstreamCore all day, but it doesn't change reality: most people who are involved with crypto care only about short term speculation /wo concern for the fundamentals.
Of course that is true for BCH supporters, but, I even believe most of the real humans that own, mine and develop BTC agree lower fees, 2MB blocks and being able to buy coffee with BTC
would be good things for BTC. If I am right, the deception that BTC has a large base of real human's who agree with Core policies is still in place and is believed by most people.