Create account

1876d
How s2x fail if it had 95% signaling?
An army of liars pretended they were the BTC community throughout social media. They claimed the community supported high fees, small blocks and a short delay until the arrival of
hv_
replied 1875d
Devs and their sales are the evil middle men still in some coins.
replied 1876d
LN to provide scaling (for the primary use case of Bitcoin - p2p cash for the world). The real BTC community fell for the lie, believed they were a minority and gave up the fight for
replied 1876d
the ticker (brand) and adoption we had spent years building.
Later we found out the loss of the primary use case of Core's BTC (p2p cash for the world) was intentional and permanent.
replied 1876d
LN is not intended to fix scaling for the people of the world
The real community never wanted high fees small blocks and the loss of BTC's primary use case. They still do not want that
replied 1876d
Actually, everyone who still owns any amount of BTC basically states that they are OK with the BlockstreamCore retardation, including the high fees and general dysfunctionality.
replied 1876d
We can hate on BlockstreamCore all day, but it doesn't change reality: most people who are involved with crypto care only about short term speculation /wo concern for the fundamentals.
replied 1876d
This will only change if utility driven demand becomes significant, compared to speculative demand.
replied 1876d
Of course that is true for BCH supporters, but, I even believe most of the real humans that own, mine and develop BTC agree lower fees, 2MB blocks and being able to buy coffee with BTC
replied 1876d
would be good things for BTC. If I am right, the deception that BTC has a large base of real human's who agree with Core policies is still in place and is believed by most people.