Not religious at all.
You physically choose to make a baby.
The baby will eventually die.
If you did not create a baby that person would not die.
Thus, you have committed murder
Because you have murdered someone in the future, you now owe them more than you can ever repay. Any failure to protect them at least until they are competent is Harm.
I'm not talking about ME, I talking about the billion odd children alive on the planet right now. I'm absolutely willing to "Harm" people who intend to "Harm" kids.
People ?!? they are not people They exist outside The One Law and can only be regarded as you might regard crocodiles, sharks, tigers or other carnivorous beasts. 'Open Season'.
I play this game when chatting with Utopians where I look for the point when I start to feel that, if they were put in charge, I'd probably be killed for thought crime. This is it.
Identifying and exiling animals who prey upon or abuse children is a ranching activity, and requires no special government goon-squads. It could be a good business opportunity.
This does happen entirely too often. It fairly results in both accuser and accused needing to justify themselves to their neighbors. This justifies an open court to appeal to.
@dash you should read up on English common law. Imperfect, but a self-organizing and determmining justice system that seeks truth through wisdomof the crowd over time
There is a BIG difference between governing and neighbors. Government is all about organizing thugs+taxes. An open court a neigborhood might hold to examine an exile event.
But you can't give me a solid figure on the question "how big is too big?". Tell me how organized is too organized. What should I do if I see an organization of people getting too big?
Government is a croup of people organized to continually coerce a population. Any size is too big. A single problem may be solved by a single-session court, ad-hoc.
"What should I do if I see an organization of people getting too big?" Difficult ! Is it popular ? For what reason ? If popular for Harm it is probably time to move elsewhere.
You're going to be a lonely nomad you're whole life then. People get together to do stuff they couldn't do alone. If it's valuable but has been corrupted I think fixing > abandoning
A mostly lonely nomad my whole life already. Nothing new there. Populations do not often cooperate with being fixed. Sometimes letting Darwin deal with it is the only solution.
This underscores the issue of a population that "learns". In theory an organization that can cause Harm should always be a one-off, Exiling someone should never be something "easy".
Rules ? This I only suggest for those who find themselves in such circumstance. And: there is no reason a neighborhood might not form its own One-Law contract if 100% agree.
Nothing ever conceived changes human nature to revert to behaviours common around the globe. The mind boggles at what transpires under the banner "Let's go make our utopian commune"
Excellent question. "Permanent" Organizations have participants with hidden agendas. Persistent hierarchy also indicates issues. The village idiot should chair occasionally.
The problem I have with anarchists and marxists alike is y'all make these "should", "would", "could" statements without ever giving a method for enforcement.
these are serving suggestions, not iron-fists Enforcement is forbidden. Fences not. Thieves should be perfectly free to starve to death in the town square. Or accept exile.
This society sounds lonely, boring, dangerous and stressful. You should visit me in Japan. It's not perfect by any stretch but they stumbled upon some secret sauce.
Shame is just another term for social-contract. I also think the balance between internal and external influence is great. They maintain a national identity without getting too cocky.