Create account

replied 2388d
I believe whatever god is, it cannot be named with silly human language. The Tao that is the Tao is not always the Tao. The Name that can be named is not always the name.
1 / 29
replied 2388d
If you want your vote to count you have to use the vote button and make your vote. It lets you put a response with your vote too.
replied 2388d
I have no vote. This is not a yes or no question.
1
1,000
replied 2388d
Yoonski but your nice reply is a yes. You are just saying that it is not describable with our language. This is a shared idea in many religions, they say God for a practical reason.
2
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2388d
Do you or do you not? That's a very simple question.
1
1,066
replied 2388d
well at the end, isn't it just a matter of yes or not? I made the question simple no to read many yes or many no, but the reason behind those.
1
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
Do you believe in Huiruuuptazlenad? It's a simple yes or no question.
replied 2388d
your question means nothing, my question is very meaningful because God has a meaning, your word has no meaning.
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
What is the meaning that God has?
replied 2387d
you can assemble your own subjective meaning-hierarchy; `god` is the name for item you have in the top position; a blow-job can be your god if that is at the top of that hierarchy 😁
replied 2387d
not really, your best wish is not God. God means something that has not beginning nor end. A blow job will start and end and require 2 people or 3 if you are luckier.
replied 2387d
not `wish`, but the thing that gives you the most `meaning` in your life ... meaning-hierarchy not wish-hierarchy 👌
replied 2388d
This word point to the absolute truth/creator/origin - Im not saying in a Judaic term, Im saying from a language term, God is what even the atheist say they don't believe. Am i clear?
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
Partly. So, you're saying
1. this word is a symbol you point to that represents that which is unchanging;
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
2. that this isn't specific to Judaism, but that everyone, including atheists, use the word the same way.
Is this accurate?
replied 2388d
It is not me to give this meaning to the word, look Cambridge Dictionary https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/god?q=God
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
"the ancient Greek gods and goddesses"
So... you believe in Zeus?
replied 2388d
sorry I dont know how to be more clear than that. God for Christian is God, for Greek was Zeus, for Hinduist Krishna.. for ancient Egyptians was the faraon.. but God is that they seek.
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
So, God is the all-knowing deity that everyone, all of the various religions, have been seeking and worshipping by different names?
replied 2387d
no Im say that the word God in our language point to that. It is like a pointer to a variable in C+ the variable change but the pointer keeps point to that. I hope you know a bit of C+
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2388d
Exactly, I noticed that. It's not a religious question in my opinion but it's rebellious to be anti-religioun so perhaps that explains the lesser amount of comments on the 'No' side.
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
How is "God" defined?
BitcoinIsP2PC4$H
replied 2387d
The entity that created everything. What created God though? And what created the thing that created that? And what created ... etc. Loop back to the present. How did this begin?
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
Yes it is. The huge question to ask about the question is, "And what is 'God' defined as?"
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2388d
There is either a creative force or not. There's no in-between.
anarchovegan
replied 2388d
Could you say more on what you mean by "creative force"?
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2387d
It means either this world has been designed or not. It's a binary option.
anarchovegan
replied 2387d
By one creator, a few, or many?
https://listverse.com/2014/11/26/10-reasons-why-our-universe-is-a-virtual-reality/
anarchovegan
replied 2387d
If we are each designers of the world, then are there 3 trillion creators?
anarchovegan
replied 2387d
Whether it has been designed or not, times multiple designers. t changes how the formerly "two" options of the binary expresses, doesn't it?


About Privacy Terms Stats