I want stable protocol for decades, want what Satoshi envisioned. No more experiments. Restore Bitcoin to its full processing power and then leave it alone.
I agree. That's why the 6 month schedule could be disastrous. A 1-yr schedule probably would have been a better idea.
Or maybe it was a good thing. Who knows.
So you like the Core ideology is what you are saying. Core argued for stability, and that was why they have been against a blocksize increase. Only ABC seeks to improve its power.
Bitcoin Cash advocates, like myself, are here for the stability that a higher TX limit allows for. All sides have always been for stability, from what I recall.
How, is the Question.
The original Bitcoin did not have a blocksize limit. What ABC is doing is better off done on reference clients and non-mining nodes. They are network improvements, not protocol.
