Create account

En Fri Mand
replied 2282d
I can't find anything in the source code of SV that should have made performance better from the ABC code it forked from. I think the reason is that the SV network hasn't .....
1 / 7
En Fri Mand
replied 2282d
... that many weak nodes that the txs have to go through.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2282d
That's certainly been an issue on this end. 5v - 0.2 AMP just didn't cut it. All nodes on PI's with crappy USB power are in reboot loops.
1
En Fri Mand
replied 2282d
I adore CoinGeek and nChain for having such good infrastructure handling gigantic blocks. Other miners could learn from them.
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2282d
My assumption is that most of the transactions are being generated directly at the miners and therefore don't have to propagate. I have no proof though.
replied 2282d
No, the Satoshi Shotgun guy starts 300(?) independent node instances around the world to send txs through, according to what he said somewhere here.
1
Simon Van Gelder
replied 2282d
Link me if you got it. Thanks.
En Fri Mand
replied 2282d
I think not, since you can see a difference in the mempools of the two networks on this website: https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#2,24h


About Privacy Terms Stats