Create account

replied 2047d
He is the only one because you also have to validate the block before sending it. This is where the real scaling issue is. Moores law is dead and we need multi threading to compensate
replied 2047d
we are on different pages.

Moore'sLaw still has a while to go before dying.
I haven't heard any developers/companies publishing statistics for bitcoin's growth.
Please, provide links.
replied 2047d
I've watched parts of the live stream of the satoshis vision conference, really interesting conference.
replied 2047d
so did I.
Who spoke about bitcoin's growth...
(gave statistics, proposed solutions)
one, two, three, five, decades from now?

SV is one of many conferences.
replied 2047d
and now SV is an option :)))

Bring it.
replied 2047d
Even if i don't fully agree with it, ABC has a long term roadmap, with each problem a proposed solution. Craig is not the only one to talk about it (and modem that dl 32MB blocks lmao)
replied 2047d
CPU clock speed is stagnating and clients are still single threaded. Not saying it's top priority. Block size was never a problem, it is how you deal with them that limits Bitcoin.
replied 2047d
we're on different pages
of different books.
replied 2047d
he has a point. as the test showed, the issue is not blocksize per se, it's overall scaling. which involves paralellizing the software (irrespective of moore).
replied 2047d
Off point.
Again.
Without a debrief of that experiment how could you possibly know what the issues were?
replied 2046d
you may be right, you are here more and have keener sense. anyways, it is quite clear to dev teams where the present issues/bottlenecks are.
replied 2047d
replied 2047d
or, topic dilution?