Create account

Sk8eM dUb
replied 2216d
Mrpumperitis
The elephant in the room is the fact that, right now, nobody needs to use BCH. Holdings are very centralized so to invest heavily you have to agree to put your head in bitmain's noose.
Mrpumperitis
replied 2216d
I agree...also i want no fork.
I honestly want both abc and cw to FORK OFF and leave the real Bitcoin alone.
If BCH needs future updates there are many capable devs to choose from.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2216d
What we have right now is a king and a challenger to the throne. If the current king can put down the biggest threat to his throne then BCH is a dictatorship(also known as a shitcoin).
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2216d
If ABC wins they have free reign to make laws to consolidate power. CTOR is the first step because it makes it more difficult for challengers to coordinate(via mining pools).
Mrpumperitis
replied 2216d
Im not liking ctor. this is what i mean,
if abc or cw does shit i dont like, ill simply leave and so will people i know.
i feel like Bitcoin is actually near death for the first time
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2216d
If SV wins they have huge incentive to make BCH the best coin it can possibly be and actually kill off the other sha256 chains. If they don't they lose billions.
replied 2216d
Most will agree that both ABC and SV are good. It just comes down to which one the miners will mine. BCH is nowhere near death. More fud. This is why it needs to be done with already.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2216d
I agree. The difference to me is that ABC has nothing to lose. They hav no investments in mining equipment. I don't think Amaury even has very much BCH. Bitmain is backed by China fiat