Gov is good a supporting rent seeking behavior. Good at paying people to not work. Good at limiting freedom (e.g. “shall not be infringed” = how many gun laws?).
Let me suggest to you that your right to free speech and guns, while a natural right, would be much more difficult for you to defend all by your lonesome.
Security/protection is a service. You dont have to cook your own food, build your own computer, build your own car. Why would you have to defend yourself?
Why would you want to protect and control your own money when you can trust banks?
*have to* being the operative word. Dash is assuming u *have to* defend yourself in the absence of gov. can choose to make or buy food, make or buy security, make or buy money storage.
If you don't write it down you'll have feudalism in no time. I don't see how this isn't self evident from a historical perspective. Whales are lazy, they don't want to compete.
I’m sure there is a clever person/group who could make it work, why not let them try?
Ironically, you'd have to become a group to try - which means you already failed.
so the irony is where?
To have a group you MUST make rules about - who's in or out, where is in or out, what happens when someone violates the rules of the group etc. If you have a group it's not anarchy.
so every group is a government?
You're proposing organizing a group based on a political ideology lol. Of course it's a government!
1) not everything with a governance structure is a government (e.g. company) 2) governments have a monopoly on violence & citizens are forced to be part of it, without that not a gov.
What happens when someone violates your "anarchy" contract? High five and say good game?
what happens when anyone violates any contract. consequences are agreed to in the contract. it may just be a high-five, thanks for the input.
is every group a government? anarchy means without rulers (ancaps define as basically gov). if you agree to join you'd sign a contract voluntarily.
Sounds like a constitution to me! What happens when you violate the contract? What if you're framed?
violations of the contract are covered in the contract when you sign it.
did you sign the constitution?
Will the children of your new anarchy paradise have to sign the contract that members have to sign to get in? What happens if they refuse?
depends on how it's written. I would favor children being subject to their parents decisions until they're an adult when they can choose.
What happens if they refuse to sign the contract? What happens if the child of a contract signer violates the contract? What if an internal group organizes to change the contract?
real question is why someone who wants to try this out needs your permission & you to be ok with every what-if scenario. Why can’t you let people do what they want?
Sounds like you don't have an answer 😂😂😂 I'm just trying to get to the bottom of the ideology by asking questions, you don't need my(or anyone's) permission lol
"There was no place for reconsideration, or revocation, except through revolution, or through consent of the States." Texas v. White
Point is, people acting through the free market provide an incredible range of products/services (some you dont even know you want until they’ve already been made).
wasn't talking about writing it down at all but sure write it down, like a contract. and have the people who want to participate in it sign it, like a contract. & don't assume consent.
It's useful to write it down - "if you live here, nobody can force you to to shut up when you're saying something they don't like. If you try to, your neighbors can arrest you"<---HUGE
you're not a soc but you’re making the same assumption. “We don’t want gov, as an organization, providing security” != “we don’t want organizations providing security.“
And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.” - Frédéric Bastiat
We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality.
government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education.
“Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by
