Marching through Mexico on the way to a safer place.
I personally don't think nations should be allowed to restrict the free flow of people, but understand we cant have that yet.
They walked through Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, passed Belize, ignored Panama, skipped Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Brazil.
I realize none of these countries are as safe as the US but surely some are safe enough. I agree the flow of people should be left to land owners & ideally,
Garden to say if any of those are safe enough considering the problems in the regions. Especially Mexico. Skipping those nations seem legitimate to me.
Parts of US are more dangerous than those countries. Why not move evry1 into Bel Air? Hard to believe there is literally nowhere in those countries that is safer than where they were
in such a situation where all land is privately owned, individuals could decide who they want on their land & under what conditions.
However, baring this situation, use of public resources (land, security, economy, institutions, culture) should limited as much as possible to avoid the tragedy of the commons.
