Yes, that is why there is the risk. The Bitmain investment.
Have yeou seen the @ryanxcharles's video on Sunday?
@_opreturn
It seems like Ryan has make the operational decision, as an executive, to support SV. He still has an obligation to Bitmain, he is the executive of an organization they invested in.
I must ask again. He touches on that point. What do you think?
I don't know what you're asking.
What do you think about the video? If you care to watch
See above comments.
Ok, so what obligation does Ryan have to Bitmain?
He says that Bitmain has invested 1M in MB.
Hahaha
I don't get it, is that not true?
No no, you got it! It is laughable.
I feel bad for Ryan, I don't see what's funny.
I wasn't laughing at Ryan, you troll
I'd like to say hopefully we can just have a clean split & everyone go their own way but hate to see the ecosystem keep fragmenting. idk how many more times it can be split.
SV should have just added replay protection and went their own way. But they were fighting for the BCH name and lost.
You want a clean split but hate to see the ecosystem fragmenting? What value has the ABC split added? The SV added value simply by rejecting ABC changes.
so it's ok to excise everyone from the community who is not bringing enough value?
I don't follow
you dont sound concerned that the community split again? & you seem to be glad ABC is 'gone' because they weren't adding value. might have misread your post tho...
What community? You misread my post. The value was created by avoiding the ABC changes. ABC destroyed value by splitting. I want the biggest group of people supporting the whitepaper.
it would be nice for everyone to do their own thing BUT the cost is more fragmentation. idk if the benefit of everyone doing their own thing is more than the cost of smaller groups.
