Create account

2316d · Fire Amaury Sechet
Wouldn't supprise me if there is multiple big player saboteurs within BCH. Heard rumors some other coins were token over by multiple saboteurs (Monero ect.). Hence the big splits?
2 / 13 1
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
IMO we must avoid a split. We can't split continuously
2
546
1NtKex776SAAJ1BD
replied 2306d
splits definitely reduce faith from newbs. but how can they be "stopped"
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
They can't. Let miners decide and go by majority hashrate. We can have a minority chain but I think it's not a problem if it's not that big. Bitcoin Clashic for example.
replied 2306d
What would there be to avoid? I can't see a way in which we would split at this moment..
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
If ABC implements Pre-consensus
homopit
replied 2306d
Pre-consensus does not change consensus rules. So, even if one client implements something like that, the network is still working on the same consensus rules.
1
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
Why are people talking about split in the chain then? :O
homopit
replied 2306d
Drama.
1
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
2) ... the pre-consensus rule that the other miners use, then they will reject to build on top of that block. That would create a split, right?
homopit
replied 2306d
No, no split. A valid block is mined, and all miners start to extend on it. Pre-consensus does not interfere with consensus rules.
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
Hm ok. then we should shut down this meaningless drama.
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
1) So let's say some miners use pre-consensus and then others don't. Then a miner not using pre-consensus includes a tx (potentially double spend) that was not agreed on in .....
En Fri Mand
replied 2306d
I'm happy that BCH is very good as it is right now. Maybe if we split again will prove that we do indeed need dictators in this world to show which path to go? ;)


About Privacy Terms Stats