Create account

Sk8eM dUb
replied 2272d
Also why does she have to make perfect decisions? A major theme of the movie is failure - and every single other main and minor character fails epically in some way.
replied 2267d
She doesn’t have to be perfect. She isnt a good leader though. She’s petulant & needlessly adversarial. She backtracks, & neglects to share plans (demanding blind trust).
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2267d
Yup, that's what makes her interesting. All of what you say is clearly on purpose. Poe is the sympathetic character, he hates her guts and the audience is supposed to too.
replied 2259d
replied 2259d
There to be a “pansexual space commander” because why not force in more genders to SW? https://www.pride.com/starwars/2018/1/08/queer-strong-vice-admiral-holdo
replied 2259d
“She’s there, in part, to show us what happens when a new and strange-looking female boss meets a hostile (and still mostly male) workplace.”
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2259d
Go watch the original Star Wars lol
replied 2259d
replied 2259d
replied 2259d
She was not there to be hated. She’s there to subvert expectations. ie purple haired, pansexual, SJW’s wearing evening gowns make great military leaders too.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2259d
replied 2246d
yes those are all good representations of strong female leaders. But it’s 2018 now & SJWs demand more representation than white women. "go asians" - jj abrams
replied 2246d
The pink haired pansexual vice admiral was shoehorned in for no other reason than to appease SJWs.
replied 2246d
Just like JK Rowling made Dumbledore gay. Not in the books anywhere, has no bearing in the story. Just to appease a vocal minority.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2259d
She was absolutely not portrayed purely as a sympathetic character. Poe fails for not respecting the line of command, she fails for ignoring the heart of her followers.
replied 2246d
& yet she was loved by audiences who gladly looked over her faults because of “muh womxn leaders”
replied 2246d