Create account

anarchovegan
replied 2294d
I mean, what ... which.... so, you don't like SV, and like ABC/Unlimited/XT in comparison?
1 / 24 1
replied 2294d
I disagree with the SV roadmap, motivations, and ethics. I disagree with ABC's knee-jerk reaction.
anarchovegan
replied 2294d
I agree with your disagreement. What was the knee-jerk reaction?
replied 2294d
The checkpoint is ok for me since we used that before and we all agree the chain is "the right one" up to that point. The reorg depth was not discussed or analyzed.
Barricade
replied 2294d
For me the checkpoint change was rushed, but I understand BCH was under threat. Most of the concern comes from BCV supporters: they want a chain more easy to attack.
replied 2294d
If some hash power from SV is enough to put BCH under threat, then we have a tremendous problem. We need to attack test net in the lab to harden against that.
1
bchbtch
replied 2294d
So BCH is an economy run by the generals?
replied 2294d
Checkpoint was first used by Satoshi years ago. Nothing wrong with increasing blockchain security.
bchbtch
replied 2294d
I'm referring to the decision making process. If under attack give power to devs. Who defines an attack?
Barricade
replied 2294d
Devs cannot enforce miners to run their software.
1
bchbtch
replied 2293d
We've seen this a few times already early forks were overruled by Core instead of POW, segwit was soft forked in and you have to run it now. You're in denial.
Barricade
replied 2293d
In early forks caused by bugs miners are incentived to upgrade. Respect later forks, what was the solution? BCH. Segwit was a soft fork, is not comparable, anyway, we forked away.
replied 2294d
The potential attacker defined the attack this time. It was the miners who defended against this attack. The checkpoint was only a minor defense.
bchbtch
replied 2293d
You're just characterizing the checkpoint, not addressing the decision making behind it.
replied 2293d
The decision making behind it was pretty simple though. Since there was the threat of attack from dishonest miners, they imeneted some protection. It is an old concept in blockchain.
bchbtch
replied 2292d
I want nothing to do with "Blockchain" I want new digital money.
replied 2292d
Blockchain was the invention of Satoshi that solved an old computer science problem. It gave you a digital asset that could not be copied and pasted. Blockchain is what makes Bitcoin.
bchbtch
replied 2292d
No, POW mining is what makes Bitcoin. This is the difference between BCH and SV. SV believes in POW mining, BCH believes the whitepaper ends at pg 2.
replied 2292d
There is no mining, and no PoW, without a blockchain.
bchbtch
replied 2292d
Yes, Bitcoin uses a blockchain but didn't come up with the design the novel invention was the POW mining game. A blockchain without POW mining is only useful in niche cases.
replied 2292d
Satoahi invented blockchain, which is made using PoW mining. The two are the same thing. Later others invented PoS, which is only for niche cases.
bchbtch
replied 2291d
This is nonsense. Blockchains existed before Bitcoin, whether you know about it or not. Satoshi may have coined the term though.
replied 2291d
Single Term Offline Coins (1991): https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmTP3NKgLiwcv3S3wo22oQhsMRXKA8ENBHNFxxqTDWhGBe
replied 2291d
Offline Electronic Cash (1991): https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmPA69pbi1vv1Yq3aYxHYrpF97iSFMGcU9N6NbqPY6BTtp
replied 2291d
NetCash (1993): https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmVSSiNZAVCdWhgWWNHHVXD3fnzFRTGNuhz3Mqqk6gHuGm
replied 2291d
Pretty sure they didnt exist. The inventions of blockchain was the invention of Bitcoin.
Barricade
replied 2294d
Oh, and I forgot when they say that adding checkpoints is turning BCH into a POS coin. What Ryan wants for BSV is closer to a PoS consensus system and weakens PoW.
anarchovegan
replied 2294d
Man, the speed at which knowing more of the tech details is so far past my understanding at this point...


About Privacy Terms Stats