Create account

replied 2284d
I think other features are needed before the #Memo mute button. We want more transactions on the network...
2 / 30 2
1,000
replied 2284d
If the mute button is activated on #Memo, it could possibly slow adoption since users won't feel their voice is heard and stop posting...
4
1,000
replied 2284d
Right now Memo is like a hybrid between 4chan/Twitter/and reddit.
1
replied 2283d
don't forget https://gab.ai
1
replied 2284d
The mute function should only work on a per account basis. The post will still show on the blockchain and as a default until an account mutes that person.
1
replied 2284d
I'm not trying to be critical but what do you pay #Memo?
replied 2284d
Nobody pays memo, but I want it to be substantial content, not ads and people telling me that Obama fucked my wife and is the antichrist gay lizard jew muslim.
1
replied 2284d
Loaded question, but what type of content would you like to see? Or what usage would you be looking for?
replied 2284d
Not what I want to see, but what I don't want to see. I just want a way for users to be able to hide/mute content that they don't like. As Memo grows, so will incentive to spam ads.
1
farsider350
replied 2284d
https://www.condomania.com/triple-power-zen-gold-male-enhancement-supplement.html
replied 2284d
You pay to get your post on the blockchain. Right?
replied 2284d
Yes. But not memo.
replied 2284d
Also, who enables #Memo to grow? The reader or the poster?
1
replied 2284d
We want to encourage new posts on #Memo. More posts = more transactions.
3
1,000
replied 2283d
Ok
replied 2284d
Even if it's a bunch of "$100 = 100 penis enlargement pills, grow your dong 99 inches in 3 hours!" posts?
replied 2284d
Theoretically, if we got 1 million new posts, that is 1 million new transactions on Bitcoin Cash...
1
replied 2284d
It's about the content.
2
replied 2284d
There must be an incentive for content creators to add content to the network.
replied 2284d
But at the same time you don't want memo to be filled with penis enlargement pill ad posts. Pretty sure that would stifle growth as well.
replied 2284d
I understand your stance. But, we need to figure out a reasonable balance here. Again, we want more transactions on Bitcoin Cash don't we?
ih8x509
replied 2283d
We want more utility. Transaction count is not an end, just a signal we are doing well.
replied 2283d
Utility will improve as transactions increase. The network effects grow. We need a bigger footprint.
replied 2284d
We need to consider what the platform would be like if there were 10x 100x and 1000x the users. I think there's a reason Twitter doesn't have a front page like this.
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2284d
It's better if Memo.cash just points to Memo++ for user moderation of their feeds istead of merging it into its natural monopoly on Memo protocol communication
replied 2284d
Who is #Memo's customer? The reader or the poster? The reader doesn't pay to read posts. Poster pays to post...
replied 2284d
They don't pay Memo.
farsider350
replied 2284d
They still pay to post. Lucky I got given my stash for posting here.
2
5,000
replied 2284d
You pay to make a transaction on the blockchain, not to post to memo - it doesn't give you privilege. If you want a echochamber and ads, then thats what you would get...
replied 2284d
...as nobody would want to come to see a bunch of ads and crazy ramblings, with a substantial post here and there.
replied 2284d
One is a BCH issue, the other is a Memo issue.


About Privacy Terms Stats