Depends what you mean by capable. The stress test showed us that at about 20 TPS the network fails to clear the mempool on subsequent blocks. They still went through fine, however.
Hmmm... That doesn’t seem like a lot 🤔 if the block size is increased or even removed, would that increase the TPS?
No because the software couldn't keep up and afaik it hit some other artificial limits put in by Core
Bitcoin ABC's tx relay is explicitly rate limited to 7 to 14tx per second.
This was added to core by G. Maxwelle and P. Wuille.
and was overlooked by ABC devs
That is why we need more implementations that would compete with each other.
While the blocksize limit is 32MB the stress test showed us that the current network is not practically capable of producing blocks much larger than 8 MB reliably. As use naturally...
increases, so will the networks capacity to process that use - so long as it isn't artificially inhibited by a blocksize that is too low.
While the blocksize limit is 32MB the stress test showed us that the current network is not practically capable of producing blocks much larger than 8 MB reliably. As use naturally...
That makes sense.
This may be an unpopular idea but what if Bitcoin Cash was integrated on top of EOS? EOS is capabile of 4,000 TPS right now and that number is only going to increase
