Second of all, a transaction T1 accepted on ABC thread at one point in time and SV at another, BU will have to reject one of those blocks as T1 cannot happen twice. Even worse if doublespend
I think the major one will be called Bitcoin Cash and if there is a minor one, that's the one implementing replay protection loosing the ticker. Like it happened with BCH and BTC.
The Bitcoin Cash fork didn't damage BTC. I think this will be the same. Though some services we are used to could could end up on the minority chain because the community split.
BCH already has a tough fight ahead to beat other coins.To split it up I think would be disastrous. Think "Divide et impera". Especially at this point in time where recognition is low.
Get the popcorn and strap in. It's gunna be a fun ride. The split doesn't matter. There will only be one coin in the end. What one will it be?? As of now BCH is best.
It didn't. I replied to this exact link somewhere else too. I don't accept that this guy's narrative is the only possibility. Also, sometimes inferior tech wins
Sounds right. Still, say BU chooses ABC, and a BU miner adds a transaction that ABC clients reject? I now believe such a setting would lead to 3 blockchains.