Create account

CryptoAnarchist
2360d · Fire Amaury Sechet
Miners are going to vote. Now that there are multiple implementations, its going to work just like originally intended.
homopit
replied 2359d
You know, Satoshi was strongly AGAINST multiple implementations. SO you can not say 'like originally intended'.
replied 2359d
He was against multiple node softwares, but not against multiple settings or configurations. Miners voting is indeed the original intent.
En Fri Mand
replied 2359d
Yes but I mean in a way that doesn't create a chain split.
replied 2359d
Why worry about a chain split? I seriously doubt there will be any economic value in the minority side, so unless you're a merchant or payment processor, just enjoy the show? -.-
En Fri Mand
replied 2359d
That we split the community and chain. I want us to stay one.
En Fri Mand
replied 2359d
But yeah. Personally I follow majority, so...
replied 2359d
Which consequences of chain split could follow?
En Fri Mand
replied 2359d
That we split the community and chain. I want us to stay one.
replied 2359d
Agree, I don't see the need in split too. I think it's better to remain single in order to better BCH adoption.
En Fri Mand
replied 2359d
yes it's very bad if we have to split once a year
replied 2359d
thats the intrinsic reason for that? bitmain ambitions? I don't believe that mempool size of something like that could be enough basement for a split on current stage.