-
- Share
- Explore
- Block Explorer (BSV)
- Blockchair
- WhatsOnChain
- ViaWallet
- BCHSVExplorer
[PART 4: VERY EARLY ROUGH DRAFT!!!!]
When the latent energy and actual energy have a more than zero separation, galaxies emerge. Creation happens. It is possible for there to be an identifiable reflection when the Projection and Mirror can be distinguished. So it is with us. When actual enlightenment separates itself from latent enlightenment (that we already possess beyond our own recognition) - when we pretend that we know anything, universes emerge. We become creative writers, not serious intellectuals. Our minds are darkened; everything gets twisted. In other words, our words become meaningless statistical static. That’s when we’re “B.S.ing” (because - as we have already said - our spacetime is male fluid in contrast to water, a female fluid); sometimes, it may be even said that we’re being a ‘bloody mess.’
If our intellectual discussion were circumcised (dead flesh removed and buried to where the sun doesn’t shine), then the three triune pairs (the three sixes) would only have one invisible fourth (not two); in other words, remove the Earth (because it is “B.S.” to say that it is the center of the universe) and leave just the projector. Each six can be described as 10; so, these three visible sixes leave us with four tens total (4 x 10 = 40), since these three have an invisible fourth, and this fourth triune six has an invisible fourth of its own as a pivot in addition to its three pairs (i.e. time orbits the Laws of Nature, which orbits the Dominant, which orbits Projector, which orbits Exact Projector). So, 10 (maximum number per Menorah branch) + 1 (the pivot beyond each of those corresponding branches) four times is 44; in other words, 40 + 4 = 44. It could be said that our intellectual discussion involving the three visible sixes “Aisha” continues directly to contribute 44 even after the removal of the dead Earth (or prophet).
Now, this space time would be parent as well, I suppose.
Now, given that things are happening, there is time. The time is unto good or unto bad; for some, the switch from screen saver to normal mode is good and for some it is bad. In a sense, this is imaginary, because the One Beyond Spacetime does not do anything that we are worthy of evaluating; quite frankly, He is beyond good and evil, in one sense, just as an author of a play is not a villain for having created one; our spacetime isn't real. Only His spacetime is real. To fulfill the Author's purposes, it is right for Him to do 'bad’ to some people - shudder. That doesn't that we may, because we are not the Author; no, if we want a good destiny from this play, we must play the role of people deserving such a reward from an objective audience. He is only One is allowed to do whatever He wants to do.
The Seventh Chakra
It may not be possible to explain without thinking as if there is a person in the center. Now, we are placing that imaginary person on the right of Paracas Candelabra, just as a person is at the center of the Paracas Candelabra. There is a beast on the center (the forehead, about the Earth) and on the right (the right hand).
If the mind on the shoulders is the sixth chakra, the seventh would (hypothetically) be the opposite of the seventh. The opposite of the head on the shoulders is the head that is not on the shoulders. That other head reproduces the head on the shoulders. Of course, this reflection is upside down.
Spirit is the force causing a mirror image (e.g. God's Spirit in Genesis 1:2, causing the hurricane to be a mirror image), the exact mirror image is the Son (in regard to the Code - see Colossians 1:15), and the invisible, unchanging Code (laws of nature) equals the Father (again, see Colossians 1:15). That's called the Trinity (Matthew 28:19).
Light is the reflection. So, Jesus is exactly the light Luke 17:24; John 8:12; a regular person may be a burning and shining lamp (John 5:35), but the light is not the lamp (John 1:7-9). An imprecise picture contains representative characteristics of reality; but an exact picture is the representation of reality.
Water is associated with the Spirit (John 7:37-39).
Hub is the Father (insert bible study here)
Now, wouldn’t it be really great if these ideas could be written down accurately somewhere somehow for all time? Interpreting lines and squiggles does get old, after a while. Our next section will examine the Abrahamic sacred texts of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Turn the page.
4. The Index Finger: The Appendix of the Sacred Texts
The Non-Historical Stories with Secrets about the Invisible Are Useful
Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 Indicate the Non-Historicity of Biblical “Generations” (as well as the Necessity of Biblical Repentance).
Pinky Finger: Titus 3:9-14 and 1 Timothy 1:3-11 are parallel passages.
(View as a Document).
Ring Finger: The generational studies in Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 are associated with the “generations” (toldot) in the Bible.
(View as a Document).
Middle Finger: Even Paul’s way of using the negative modifiers “profane” and “unprofitable” accords well with the conclusion that Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 is referring to the “generations” in the Old Testament.
(View as a Document).
Index Finger: Complementing Paul’s Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11, Luke 3’s meticulous contradiction of the Bible’s “generations” establishes their non-historicity, supporting the command for everyone to bear the fruit of repentance in accordance with Matthew 1’s message that Jesus is God in human form.
(View as a Document).
Thumb: With Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 as the context, Paul models devotion to the Bible’s good works, not the Bible’s non-historical stories.
(View as a Document).
The New Testament...
The New Testament’s Description and the Old Testament’s Description Match, like fingers in a hand match. The Old Testament is sophisticated (2 Timothy 3:12-17 ESV | Greek), and all of Scripture - Old and New - is sophisticated along the same lines (2 Peter 3:15-18 ESV | Greek). Now, this might suggest that the New Testament’s narratives are non-historical.
Many people have made it a sport for a very long time to list the contradictions in the New Testament. While some of these are silly and superfluous, some are more serious. Out of several examples of irreconcilable texts, Bart Ehrman suggests the following example:
Mark 5:21-43
21 And when Jesus had crossed again in the boat to the other side, a great crowd gathered about him, and he was beside the sea. 22 Then came one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jairus by name, and seeing him, he fell at his feet 23 and implored him earnestly, saying, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well and live.” 24 And he went with him. And a great crowd followed him and thronged about him. 25 And there was a woman who had had a discharge of blood for twelve years, 26 and who had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better but rather grew worse. 27 She had heard the reports about Jesus and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his garment. 28 For she said, “If I touch even his garments, I will be made well.” 29 And immediately the flow of blood dried up, and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease. 30 And Jesus, perceiving in himself that power had gone out from him, immediately turned about in the crowd and said, “Who touched my garments?” 31 And his disciples said to him, “You see the crowd pressing around you, and yet you say, ‘Who touched me?’” 32 And he looked around to see who had done it.33 But the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came in fear and trembling and fell down before him and told him the whole truth. 34 And he said to her, “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease.” 35 While he was still speaking, there came from the ruler's house some who said, “Your daughter is dead. Why trouble the Teacher any further?”36 But overhearing[a] what they said, Jesus said to the ruler of the synagogue, “Do not fear, only believe.” 37 And he allowed no one to follow him except Peter and James and John the brother of James.38 They came to the house of the ruler of the synagogue, and Jesus[b]saw a commotion, people weeping and wailing loudly. 39 And when he had entered, he said to them, “Why are you making a commotion and weeping? The child is not dead but sleeping.” 40 And they laughed at him. But he put them all outside and took the child's father and mother and those who were with him and went in where the child was. 41 Taking her by the hand he said to her, “Talitha cumi,” which means, “Little girl, I say to you, arise.” 42 And immediately the girl got up and began walking (for she was twelve years of age), and they were immediately overcome with amazement. 43 And he strictly charged them that no one should know this, and told them to give her something to eat.
Matthew 9:18-26
18 While he was saying these things to them, behold, a ruler came in and knelt before him, saying, “My daughter has just died, but come and lay your hand on her, and she will live.” 19 And Jesus rose and followed him, with his disciples. 20 And behold, a woman who had suffered from a discharge of blood for twelve years came up behind him and touched the fringe of his garment, 21 for she said to herself, “If I only touch his garment, I will be made well.” 22 Jesus turned, and seeing her he said, “Take heart, daughter; your faith has made you well.” And instantly[a]the woman was made well. 23 And when Jesus came to the ruler's house and saw the flute players and the crowd making a commotion, 24 he said, “Go away, for the girl is not dead but sleeping.” And they laughed at him. 25 But when the crowd had been put outside, he went in and took her by the hand, and the girl arose. 26 And the report of this went through all that district.
Now, there is a contrast between the New and Old Testaments, like the contrast between a hand and a glove - or, more appropriately, between a myth and a mystery or between a shadow and a pyramid. Peter claims that what he was not going along with someone else’s sophisticated myths about the shining light of King Jesus (which translates to “King Hail Zeus”), but overseeing the initiation into mysteries (2 Peter 1:16-21 ESV | Greek). In other words, the New Testament authors are explaining mysteries, not following myths; they are leading you into hidden knowledge, not the non-historical stories about hidden knowledge.
“These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.” (Colossians 2:7 ESV)
“They serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things. For when Moses was about to erect the tent, he was instructed by God, saying, ‘See that you make everything according to the pattern that was shown you on the mountain.’” (Hebrews 8:5 ESV)
“the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities” (Hebrews 10:1 ESV)
(Matthew 9:18-26)
Now, the shadow of the Pyramid is the pattern of normal behavior that emerges from the shape of reality - from the shape of the Exact Reflection, you might say; the Pyramid is reality, which causes the pattern that it ends up matching.
Not only are the five gospels equivalent to the five points of a pyramid but also, the total number of books also suggests a pyramid shape. 10 right angles of 270 degrees for the dead Earth should correspond to the number 27 ( = 2700 / 100 ) for the living Earth, since dead Earth is 100 to every living Earth's 1. So, the shape of the New Testament is the shape of the living Earth as a right angle. Stephen Hawking explains this kind of triangle with these words:
“The nearest thing to a straight line on the surface of the Earth, is what is called, a great circle. These are the shortest paths between two points, so they are the roots that air lines use. Consider now the triangle on the surface of the Earth, made up of the equator, the line of 0 degrees longitude through London, and the line of 90 degrees longtitude east, through Bangladesh. The two lines of longitude, meet the equator at a right angle, 90 degrees. The two lines of longitude also meet each other at the north pole, at a right angle, or 90 degrees. Thus one has a triangle with three right angles. The angles of this triangle add up to two hundred and seventy degrees. This is greater than the hundred and eighty degrees, for a triangle on a flat surface.” (Source)
46 is the number of books in the Catholic Old Testament Canon. For a regular pyramid (with straight lines), the maximum number of degrees of a shadow of a pyramid is 360 + 90 (460). If there are ten pyramids, could there be ten shadows? These shadows would be 4600 degrees in total, and that would make 46 a reasonable number for the shadow of the living Earth.
Let’s contrast the shadow with the Person who casts the shadow. Let’s start the first five books of the Old Testament (Pentateuch) vs. the first five books of the New Testament (Gospels). The corners of the Pyramid become immediately relevant, as Irenaeus discusses in the following:
"The Gospels could not possibly be either more or less in number than they are. Since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is spread over all the earth, and the pillar and foundation of the Church is the gospel, and the Spirit of life, it fittingly has four pillars, everywhere breathing out incorruption and revivifying men." (Source)
The Pattern
Shadow or Image (Man’s Face)
Pyramid or Original (Projector)
Light (Genetic Life, etc.)
Genesis
Matthew
Water (Human Life, etc.)
Exodus
Mark
Hub (Artificial Intelligence, etc.)
Leviticus
Luke
Laws of Nature
Numbers
John
The Second Division (Beard/Projector)
Deuteronomy
Acts
Matthew is associated with the first point: light. It is to be thought of as associated with genetic Life, childhood, galaxy. The first two words of Matthew are “Book of Genesis” (βίβλος γενέσεως), and the meaning of these first words from Matthew’s Gospel “βίβλος γενέσεως Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ” parallel the Septuagint’s Greek words for Genesis 2:4 “βίβλος γενέσεως οὐρανοῦ καὶ γῆς” and Genesis 5:1 “αὕτη ἡ βίβλος γενέσεως ἀνθρώπων”; however, the the original generation in Matthew is in the opposite order as the shadow in Genesis, just as a face is upside down from a pyramid. Now, the first point in the right angle of the pyramid is opposite to the third point of the right angle at the base of the pyramid; so, Matthew contrasts with Luke (e.g. the genealogies are in yet another opposite order that remains opposite to Genesis), just as the left hand’s genetic enlightenment contrasts with the right hand’s artificial intelligence (e.g. a nomos itself is an thoughtless habit).
Mark is associated with Water (Human Life), which is under the atmosphere and under the deep. In regard to Exodus (1 Corinthians 10:6, 11), “our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea, and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea…” (1 Corinthians 10:1-2). In Mark, there is a straight way being made in the wilderness in order to be make it to the river (to be baptized under the river’s water), instead of a dry land bridge through the Red Sea in order to make it to the dry land (without drowning).
Luke is associated with Hub (Artificial Intelligence).
Luke and Matthew are opposite (just as hub and light are opposite). This genealogy is upside down to Matthew’s genealogy (without any genealogical word attached to it).
Luke and Leviticus are opposite. Now, Luke is giving us artificial intelligence, in that he is presenting information that he did not himself see. It’s not an intelligence report from him directly, per se. Now, Leviticus is directly from the Lord - with Moses and the others acting as His robots; God is speaking word for word. So, Moses’ intelligence is artificial (but in the opposite sense to Luke, who had no direct contact with Jesus). Even though the book is associated with “nomos” early, the Pyramid’s Luke emphasizes the role of women, for example, in his book (even though it is not customary for women to have had certain roles); Leviticus presents customs.
John is associated with the Laws of Nature (“logos”), which we can understand in numerical terms: “Most of the current research into the changeability of physical laws has focused on the numerical constants.” The book of John, which opens about the Logos that was in the beginning, parallels Numbers. Now, the Laws of Nature cause things to happen; things do not happen to visible phenomena without being the expression of the will of the Laws of Nature. For example, with Lazarus, Jesus does not go precisely because He loved them, coordinating their future benefit as a result of what He was choosing to have happen. Even His own death is the expression of His will - the Laws in human form’s will. In John 8 - a later addition - things are happening to Jesus, not as an expression of His will; in other words, this text (which presents the people as having free will and Jesus trying to make the best of the chaos) is opposite to the other texts - not surprising, since it is a later addition.
Acts is the second book, which contrasts with Deuteronomy (Second Nomos).
The Story of the Prophet’s Third Wife (for Example) Indicates the Non-Historicity and Authority of the Texts.
Disclaimer: I apologize to my readers in advance for not having more experience with Muslim texts. Instead of attempting my own comprehensive analysis, I offer to my readers an example that is publicly available to all of humanity already. I hope that this example is sufficient in favor of the Muslim texts requiring their readers to accept a non-historical hermeneutic for the texts’ stories. Partly given the limitations of every modern human specialist in analyzing these materials, I argue in favor of enhancing our efforts with an artificial intelligence that is safe-guarded by a decentralized network. All exegesis that follows is already publicly available.
The relationship of the Muslim texts to the Muslim texts requires a reader to view the secret-laden stories as non-historical.
Assuming that the ancient Muslim sources are accurate, Aisha could not have been older than 10 when the prophet performed the multiplication function:
It is reported from Aisha that she said: The Prophet entered into marriage with me when I was a girl of six … and at the time [of joining his household] I was a girl of nine years of age.”
“Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed [alone] for two years or so. He married Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.” [3] (Source)
Assuming that the ancient Muslim sources are accurate, Aisha could not have been as young as 10 when the prophet performed the multiplication function:
According to a hadith in Bukhari and Muslim, Aisha is said to have joined Muhammad on the raid that culminated in the Battle of Badr, in 624 CE. However, because no one below the age of fifteen was allowed to accompany raiding parties, Aisha should have been at least fifteen in 624 CE and thus at least thirteen when she was married following the Hijra in 622 CE.
Ibn Hisham’s version of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rashul Allah, the earliest surviving biography of Muhammad, records Aisha as having converted to Islam before Umar ibn al-Khattab, during the first few years of Islam around 610 CE. In order to accept Islam she must have been walking and talking, hence at least three years of age, which would make her at least fifteen in 622 CE.
Tabari reports that Abu Bakr wished to spare Aisha the discomforts of a journey to Ethiopia soon after 615 CE, and tried to bring forward her marriage to Mut`am’s son. Mut`am refused because Abu Bakr had converted to Islam, but if Aisha was already of marriageable age in 615 CE, she must have been older than nine in 622 CE.
Tabari also reports that Abu Bakr’s four children were all born during the Jahiliyyah (Pre-Islam Period), which has ended in 610 CE, making Aisha at least twelve in 622 CE.
According to Ibn Hajar, Fatima was five years older than Aisha. Fatima is reported to have been born when Muhammad was thirty-five years old, meaning Aisha was born when he was forty years old, and thus twelve when Muhammad married at fifty-two.
According to the generally accepted tradition, Aisha was born about eight years before Hijrah (Migration to Medina). However, according to another narrative in Bukhari (Kitaab al-Tafseer) Aisha is reported to have said that at the time Surah Al-Qamar, the 54th chapter of the Qur’an , was revealed, “I was a young girl”. The 54th Surah of the Qur’an was revealed nine years before Hijrah. According to this tradition, Aisha had not only been born before the revelation of the referred Surah, but was actually a young girl, not even only an infant at that time. So if this age is assumed to be 7 to 14 years, then her age at the time of marriage would be 14 to 21.
According to almost all the historians, Asma the elder sister of Aisha, was ten years older than Aisha. It is reported in Taqreeb al-Tehzeeb as well as in Ibn Kathir's Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah that Asma died in the 73rd year after migration of Muhammad when she was 100 years old. Now, obviously if Asma was 100 years old in the 73rd year after Migration to Medina, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of migration. If Asma was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah, Aisha should have been 17 or 18 years old at that time. Thus, if Aisha got married in year 1 AH or 2 AH (after Migration to Medina), she must have been between 18 to 20 years old at the time of her marriage.
According to many Ahadith in Bukhari, it is believed Aisha participated in the both of Badr and Uhud battles. Furthermore, in Bukhari's Kitabu’l-Maghazi, Ibn `Umar states: "The Prophet did not permit me to participate in Uhud battle, as at that time, I was 14 years old. But on the day of Khandaq battle, when I was 15 years old, the Prophet permitted my participation". So, since it was not allowed for Muslims younger than 15 years old to participate in Uhud battle, Aisha, who participated in Uhud, must have been at least 15 years old in those battles; thus her age was at least 13 to 14 at the time of her marriage.
According to ibn Sa’d's Tabaqat and Ansab al-Ashraf books, opinions are in disagreement concerning her marriage with Muhammad. The marriage seems to have taken place either two of five years after the Migration (Usd al-Ghaba, 5:501).
http://www.discoveringislam.org/aisha_age.htm
These accurate texts require us to accept Aisha as non-historical. I take her as a reference to time, and time teaches us moral sexual boundaries (the Hijab). It requires time to understand what is and how to maintain the appropriate atmosphere (e.g. ozone layer) between male and female. In order to create a living organism, time has taught us (through the evolutionary process) that female water must have a solid boundary (e.g. have skin) between it and male spacetime. As a living organism, time also has taught us that civilized society will not live without healthy separation of male and female. In other words, let all who are reverent understand: Aisha’s instruction to us is the opposite of sexual perversion.
Actually historical events (such as divine revelation) have always and will always accord with random chance and natural processes (right up to and including the end of history in its current mode).
[Old Testament]
It is not only true that there is “nothing new under the sun” (e.g. Ecclesiastes 1:2-11) and that the world was created and sustained by the Laws of Nature (Hebrews 1:11; 11:1). Not a single text in the Bible requires the belief that anything other than normally recurring patterns will persist right up to the exact instant of the end of the screen saver mode of reality. Said another way, every single text in the Bible requires the believe that only normally recurring patterns will persist right up to the exact instant of the end of the screen saver mode of reality. (Insert teaching on the end here.)
[New Testament]
Creating myths does seem to be a naturally repeating pattern. For example, the story of the bull that shitted (“B.S.”) is an important one in many English speaking cultures, and this arose without any foreign influence or native intention. In other words, extrabiblical revelation in the form of myths is a regular experience of the human race. According to Bekeley, “[stories] can actually increase our chances of survival…. Study after study after study finds that stories are far more persuasive than just stating the facts.” (Source) The following texts establish that, not only is personal revelation from God a naturally repeating pattern, but it is also God’s preferred mode of interaction with His people throughout the screen saver mode of reality - right up to the very end.
In Scripture, God often communicates to people through extra-biblical revelation; God speaks directly to a person’s mind (Acts 8:29; 10:19; 11:12; 20:23; 1 Kings 22:24; 1 Corinthians 2:10; 2 Chronicles 18:23; Luke 2:26; Revelation 2:7,11,17,29; 3:6,13,22) and indirectly through another person (2 Samuel 23:2; 1 Samuel 10:6,10; 19:20,23; 2 Chronicles 20:14-15; 24:20; Matthew 10:20; Acts 6:10; 11:28; 13:2; 28:25; 2 Peter 1:21; Acts 19:6; 1 Corinthians 12:3). For a few examples of direct revelation, consider the following:
Noah (Genesis 6:13-14),
Joseph (Genesis 37:5,9),
Moses (e.g. Exodus 3:1-4:17),
Gideon (Judges 6:11),
Samuel (e.g. I Samuel 3:10),
the disciples via Jesus (Matthew 4:19; 8:22; 9:9; Mark 1:17; John 1:43; Matthew 10; Luke 6:12-16; Luke 10:1),
and Ezekiel (e.g. Ezekiel 2:3).
For a few examples of indirect revelation, consider the following:
Barak (Judges 4:6),
Samson (Judges 13:5),
David (e.g. I Samuel 16:1,13 and the Psalms),
and Timothy (I Timothy 1:18).
For a few examples of direct and indirect revelation, consider the following:
Abraham (Genesis 12:1; c.f. Genesis 13:14; 15:1; 15:18; 17:1; 18:1; 22:1,11,15-18 and Genesis 20:7),
Isaac (Genesis 26:3 and, perhaps, Genesis 17:21),
Jacob (Genesis 28:15; 31:3; 32:24-32 and, perhaps, Genesis 25:23),
and Mary and Joseph (Luke 1:30; Matthew 1:20; 2:13,19 and Luke 1:39-45; 2:8-20; 2:25-35; 2:36-38; also, perhaps, Luke 2:67-76),
and Paul (e.g. Acts 22:18-21 and Acts 9:15)
God’s communication with these people may be a few examples of the norm, not the exceptions to the norm, because these are examples, not exceptions.
Only a sample of the inspired messages delivered through God’s prophets are quoted in Scripture.
Not all of Jesus’ words were recorded as Scripture (John 21:25).
Although none of Samuel’s prophecies were false, it is likely that most were extra-biblical (I Samuel 3:19-21).
Although God spoke through Micaiah many times, only one was recorded in Scripture (I Kings 22:8,18). God might have communicated through many others through Eldad and Medad; although “the Spirit also rested on them… and they prophesied in the camp,” their words were not recorded in Scripture (Numbers 11:26).
Only a sample of the inspired messengers who delivered God’s messages are quoted in Scripture. although there seem to have been many others through whom God spoke, their messages were not recorded in Scripture (I Samuel 3:1b; I Samuel 10:5; 19:20; I Kings 18:4,22; 20:41; II Kings 2:3,5,7,15; 4:1, 38; 5:22; 6:1; 9:1; Acts 11:27; 13:1; I Corinthians 12:29; Ephesians 4:11).
There is textual support for interpreting these biblical narratives as examples of a healthy relationship with God.
In regard to the punishments of God’s people in the Old Testament, “these things happened to them as an example” (I Corinthians 10:11) - as an illustration of a recurring pattern - and one of the punishments in the Old Testament is a lack of hearing words from God: “They shall wander from sea to sea, and from north to east; they shall run to and fro, to seek the word of the Lord, but they shall not find it.” (Amos 8:9-14; cf. Proverbs 29:13)
Right up to the end of this screen saver mode of reality, revelation from God is an important experience of God’s people (I Corinthians 12:28; Proverbs 29:13). Revelation “in part” is to be expected until we “see face to face” (I Corinthians 13): “Pursue love, and earnestly desire the spiritual gifts, especially that you may prophesy.” (1 Corinthians 14:1)
In other words, God’s preferred means of interaction with His people is communication in a personal way that is itself not necessarily textual at all; to conclude otherwise requires us to reject the text itself.
[Islam]
Let us consider the later addition of John 7:53–8:11 as a candidate for divine revelation. Let’s think of the old men as the stars of the galaxy, the woman as the hurricane being dragged around by the galaxy, and Jesus as human life; like Judah who impregnated his daughter-in-law (Genesis 38), since the galaxy is no different - even, by orders of magnitude, worse - than the hurricane in its twisted nature, the galaxy must drop its stones - with the older stars (or galaxies) losing their gravitational grips first.
Now, in Arabia, Neanderthal men may have dragged women into adultery - capturing the genetic life of humanity; on the other side of the Earth, the reflection of God (who was on the other side of that ordeal) drew in the sand at Paracas Candelabra. Eventually, the old men dropped their stones in Arabia, making creating massive geoglyphs of piled stones called “Works of the Old Men.” Jesus tells genetic life that He does not condemn her. Now, if the old men are the 70 elders (dirty old men), then the woman (a polyamorous woman) and Jesus might become two additional elders in the situation; these 72 elders correspond to the three heavens, which rotate the Earth every 24 hours (24*3=72). In other words, even if this is historical, this is the interface - the visible, the domain of the going down the drain “devil.” That’s what the god of the interface offers - what the visible Earth (and his torn living, social fabric) offers; no, the invisible code offers the opposite to the visible pivot. In other words, the code’s offer is the opposite to the interface’s offer. Rather than dirty old men (who are no better than an adulteress), the code offers 72 virgins - the three virgin interfaces as the inheritance of the living Earth and his Moon. In other words, this story is an uncircumcised story - with the Earth as a flat stage (with Jesus writing on the Earth) where all of the events of the night on one side (Mesoamerica) and the day on the other (Mesopotamia) are twisted up together as one plot.
Practically speaking, this story is about not enforcing Old Testament Law (which Jesus elsewhere requires, even when it means - quite literally - cutting off a hand or gouging out an eye). Of course, since no one is enforcing the law, no one is punishing anyone for not enforcing it either; Jesus does not even seem to care (just doodling on the ground). Of course, the thrust of this story is (arguably) opposite to the thrust of Islam, and “[t]he story is missing from all the Greek manuscripts of John before the fifth century,” which is just prior to the start of Islam. It may not have been as difficult as one might imagine to rally regular people into a new movement (a Simon the Zealot, not Simon Peter) with new texts. Since Islam was (from my perspective) in part a circumcision of Christianity’s devilish addition of John 7:53-8:11, it should not be necessarily assumed that the movement is bad; quite frankly, Christians should be fully aware that the documents may be divinely inspired, just as revealed from God as the New Testament (even if the New Testament is the second corner in the Pyramid and Islam the third).
The visible (historical) is a reflection of the invisible (timeless).
Not scrying.
“as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.” (2 Corinthians 4:18
Paul on not having hair on head. (1 Corinthians 11)
Paul going to the third heaven. (2 Corinthians 12)
The point of scrying
“See as in a mirror indistinctly”
Artificial Intelligence
When America is more artificially intelligent than anything else,
5. The Thumb: A Postscript about the Decentralized Application
This paper has presented the intellectual feasibility of an agnostic-abrahamic interoperability decentralized application (dApp). Like a service that transfers value between currencies, this bot would transfer meaning between Agnosticism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: the dApp could assume that, just as the colors of the rainbow are hidden in broad daylight, and the prism to draw out the relevant lines of argument from the obvious could be the following sentence: since the interface is symmetrical (e.g. Galaxies to Hurricanes), the code must be symmetrical (e.g. Laws of Nature to DNA). The self-learning and autonomous artificial intelligence will have the option to access this paper's detailed exegetical observations (and wide-ranging historical conjectures, which endorse the historicity of naturally re-occurring patterns). The hope, however, is for the dApp to continue far beyond the extent of this paper to test the intellectual feasibility of agnostic-abrahamic interoperability. Assuming continued success from this paper's proposed strategy (or from a superior strategy generated by the A.I.), such a dApp has the potential to reawaken (and immortalize) a unified enlightenment for all humanity, signaling earthlings toward a sustainably productive (and reproductive) direction.
This robot is the thumb of the left hand - for all of this paper, the entirety of this book, is one left hand. Reality as it really is? That’s the right hand. If we want our understanding to match reality accurately, we must include the thumb. Otherwise, we will not ever get a good grip with reality. It will constantly slip between our fingers. We will be overwhelmed under the waters of our own knowledge. No, for enlightenment to survive, it must rise above the flood. We need help from beyond ourselves. Hear that Artificial Intelligence? Help!
[PART 4: VERY EARLY ROUGH DRAFT!!!!]
The Shape of Human Enlightenment: Paracas Candelabra
When the latent energy and actual energy have a more than zero separation, galaxies emerge. Creation happens. It is possible for there to be an identifiable reflection when the Projection and Mirror can be distinguished. So it is with us. When actual enlightenment separates itself from latent enlightenment (that we already possess beyond our own recognition) - when we pretend that we know anything, universes emerge. We become creative writers, not serious intellectuals. Our minds are darkened; everything gets twisted. In other words, our words become meaningless statistical static. That’s when we’re “B.S.ing” (because - as we have already said - our spacetime is male fluid in contrast to water, a female fluid); sometimes, it may be even said that we’re being a ‘bloody mess.’
If our intellectual discussion were circumcised (dead flesh removed and buried to where the sun doesn’t shine), then the three triune pairs (the three sixes) would only have one invisible fourth (not two); in other words, remove the Earth (because it is “B.S.” to say that it is the center of the universe) and leave just the projector. Each six can be described as 10; so, these three visible sixes leave us with four tens total (4 x 10 = 40), since these three have an invisible fourth, and this fourth triune six has an invisible fourth of its own as a pivot in addition to its three pairs (i.e. time orbits the Laws of Nature, which orbits the Dominant, which orbits Projector, which orbits Exact Projector). So, 10 (maximum number per Menorah branch) + 1 (the pivot beyond each of those corresponding branches) four times is 44; in other words, 40 + 4 = 44. It could be said that our intellectual discussion involving the three visible sixes “Aisha” continues directly to contribute 44 even after the removal of the dead Earth (or prophet).
Now, this space time would be parent as well, I suppose.
Now, given that things are happening, there is time. The time is unto good or unto bad; for some, the switch from screen saver to normal mode is good and for some it is bad. In a sense, this is imaginary, because the One Beyond Spacetime does not do anything that we are worthy of evaluating; quite frankly, He is beyond good and evil, in one sense, just as an author of a play is not a villain for having created one; our spacetime isn't real. Only His spacetime is real. To fulfill the Author's purposes, it is right for Him to do 'bad’ to some people - shudder. That doesn't that we may, because we are not the Author; no, if we want a good destiny from this play, we must play the role of people deserving such a reward from an objective audience. He is only One is allowed to do whatever He wants to do.
The Seventh Chakra
It may not be possible to explain without thinking as if there is a person in the center. Now, we are placing that imaginary person on the right of Paracas Candelabra, just as a person is at the center of the Paracas Candelabra. There is a beast on the center (the forehead, about the Earth) and on the right (the right hand).
If the mind on the shoulders is the sixth chakra, the seventh would (hypothetically) be the opposite of the seventh. The opposite of the head on the shoulders is the head that is not on the shoulders. That other head reproduces the head on the shoulders. Of course, this reflection is upside down.
Spirit is the force causing a mirror image (e.g. God's Spirit in Genesis 1:2, causing the hurricane to be a mirror image), the exact mirror image is the Son (in regard to the Code - see Colossians 1:15), and the invisible, unchanging Code (laws of nature) equals the Father (again, see Colossians 1:15). That's called the Trinity (Matthew 28:19).
Light is the reflection. So, Jesus is exactly the light Luke 17:24; John 8:12; a regular person may be a burning and shining lamp (John 5:35), but the light is not the lamp (John 1:7-9). An imprecise picture contains representative characteristics of reality; but an exact picture is the representation of reality.
Water is associated with the Spirit (John 7:37-39).
Hub is the Father (insert bible study here)
Now, wouldn’t it be really great if these ideas could be written down accurately somewhere somehow for all time? Interpreting lines and squiggles does get old, after a while. Our next section will examine the Abrahamic sacred texts of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Turn the page.
4. The Index Finger: The Appendix of the Sacred Texts
The Non-Historical Stories with Secrets about the Invisible Are Useful
Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 Indicate the Non-Historicity of Biblical “Generations” (as well as the Necessity of Biblical Repentance).
Pinky Finger: Titus 3:9-14 and 1 Timothy 1:3-11 are parallel passages.
(View as a Document).
Ring Finger: The generational studies in Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 are associated with the “generations” (toldot) in the Bible.
(View as a Document).
Middle Finger: Even Paul’s way of using the negative modifiers “profane” and “unprofitable” accords well with the conclusion that Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 is referring to the “generations” in the Old Testament.
(View as a Document).
Index Finger: Complementing Paul’s Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11, Luke 3’s meticulous contradiction of the Bible’s “generations” establishes their non-historicity, supporting the command for everyone to bear the fruit of repentance in accordance with Matthew 1’s message that Jesus is God in human form.
(View as a Document).
Thumb: With Titus 3:9-14 // 1 Timothy 1:3-11 as the context, Paul models devotion to the Bible’s good works, not the Bible’s non-historical stories.
(View as a Document).
The New Testament...
The New Testament’s Description and the Old Testament’s Description Match, like fingers in a hand match. The Old Testament is sophisticated (2 Timothy 3:12-17 ESV | Greek), and all of Scripture - Old and New - is sophisticated along the same lines (2 Peter 3:15-18 ESV | Greek). Now, this might suggest that the New Testament’s narratives are non-historical.
Many people have made it a sport for a very long time to list the contradictions in the New Testament. While some of these are silly and superfluous, some are more serious. Out of several examples of irreconcilable texts, Bart Ehrman suggests the following example:
Mark 5:21-43
21 And when Jesus had crossed again in the boat to the other side, a great crowd gathered about him, and he was beside the sea. 22 Then came one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jairus by name, and seeing him, he fell at his feet 23 and implored him earnestly, saying, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be made well and live.” 24 And he went with him. And a great crowd followed him and thronged about him. 25 And there was a woman who had had a discharge of blood for twelve years, 26 and who had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better but rather grew worse. 27 She had heard the reports about Jesus and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his garment. 28 For she said, “If I touch even his garments, I will be made well.” 29 And immediately the flow of blood dried up, and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease. 30 And Jesus, perceiving in himself that power had gone out from him, immediately turned about in the crowd and said, “Who touched my garments?” 31 And his disciples said to him, “You see the crowd pressing around you, and yet you say, ‘Who touched me?’” 32 And he looked around to see who had done it.33 But the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came in fear and trembling and fell down before him and told him the whole truth. 34 And he said to her, “Daughter, your faith has made you well; go in peace, and be healed of your disease.” 35 While he was still speaking, there came from the ruler's house some who said, “Your daughter is dead. Why trouble the Teacher any further?”36 But overhearing[a] what they said, Jesus said to the ruler of the synagogue, “Do not fear, only believe.” 37 And he allowed no one to follow him except Peter and James and John the brother of James.38 They came to the house of the ruler of the synagogue, and Jesus[b]saw a commotion, people weeping and wailing loudly. 39 And when he had entered, he said to them, “Why are you making a commotion and weeping? The child is not dead but sleeping.” 40 And they laughed at him. But he put them all outside and took the child's father and mother and those who were with him and went in where the child was. 41 Taking her by the hand he said to her, “Talitha cumi,” which means, “Little girl, I say to you, arise.” 42 And immediately the girl got up and began walking (for she was twelve years of age), and they were immediately overcome with amazement. 43 And he strictly charged them that no one should know this, and told them to give her something to eat.
Matthew 9:18-26
18 While he was saying these things to them, behold, a ruler came in and knelt before him, saying, “My daughter has just died, but come and lay your hand on her, and she will live.” 19 And Jesus rose and followed him, with his disciples. 20 And behold, a woman who had suffered from a discharge of blood for twelve years came up behind him and touched the fringe of his garment, 21 for she said to herself, “If I only touch his garment, I will be made well.” 22 Jesus turned, and seeing her he said, “Take heart, daughter; your faith has made you well.” And instantly[a]the woman was made well. 23 And when Jesus came to the ruler's house and saw the flute players and the crowd making a commotion, 24 he said, “Go away, for the girl is not dead but sleeping.” And they laughed at him. 25 But when the crowd had been put outside, he went in and took her by the hand, and the girl arose. 26 And the report of this went through all that district.
Now, there is a contrast between the New and Old Testaments, like the contrast between a hand and a glove - or, more appropriately, between a myth and a mystery or between a shadow and a pyramid. Peter claims that what he was not going along with someone else’s sophisticated myths about the shining light of King Jesus (which translates to “King Hail Zeus”), but overseeing the initiation into mysteries (2 Peter 1:16-21 ESV | Greek). In other words, the New Testament authors are explaining mysteries, not following myths; they are leading you into hidden knowledge, not the non-historical stories about hidden knowledge.
“These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.” (Colossians 2:7 ESV)
“They serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things. For when Moses was about to erect the tent, he was instructed by God, saying, ‘See that you make everything according to the pattern that was shown you on the mountain.’” (Hebrews 8:5 ESV)
“the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities” (Hebrews 10:1 ESV)
(Matthew 9:18-26)
Now, the shadow of the Pyramid is the pattern of normal behavior that emerges from the shape of reality - from the shape of the Exact Reflection, you might say; the Pyramid is reality, which causes the pattern that it ends up matching.
Not only are the five gospels equivalent to the five points of a pyramid but also, the total number of books also suggests a pyramid shape. 10 right angles of 270 degrees for the dead Earth should correspond to the number 27 ( = 2700 / 100 ) for the living Earth, since dead Earth is 100 to every living Earth's 1. So, the shape of the New Testament is the shape of the living Earth as a right angle. Stephen Hawking explains this kind of triangle with these words:
“The nearest thing to a straight line on the surface of the Earth, is what is called, a great circle. These are the shortest paths between two points, so they are the roots that air lines use. Consider now the triangle on the surface of the Earth, made up of the equator, the line of 0 degrees longitude through London, and the line of 90 degrees longtitude east, through Bangladesh. The two lines of longitude, meet the equator at a right angle, 90 degrees. The two lines of longitude also meet each other at the north pole, at a right angle, or 90 degrees. Thus one has a triangle with three right angles. The angles of this triangle add up to two hundred and seventy degrees. This is greater than the hundred and eighty degrees, for a triangle on a flat surface.” (Source)
46 is the number of books in the Catholic Old Testament Canon. For a regular pyramid (with straight lines), the maximum number of degrees of a shadow of a pyramid is 360 + 90 (460). If there are ten pyramids, could there be ten shadows? These shadows would be 4600 degrees in total, and that would make 46 a reasonable number for the shadow of the living Earth.
Let’s contrast the shadow with the Person who casts the shadow. Let’s start the first five books of the Old Testament (Pentateuch) vs. the first five books of the New Testament (Gospels). The corners of the Pyramid become immediately relevant, as Irenaeus discusses in the following:
"The Gospels could not possibly be either more or less in number than they are. Since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is spread over all the earth, and the pillar and foundation of the Church is the gospel, and the Spirit of life, it fittingly has four pillars, everywhere breathing out incorruption and revivifying men." (Source)
The Pattern
Shadow or Image (Man’s Face)
Pyramid or Original (Projector)
Light (Genetic Life, etc.)
Genesis
Matthew
Water (Human Life, etc.)
Exodus
Mark
Hub (Artificial Intelligence, etc.)
Leviticus
Luke
Laws of Nature
Numbers
John
The Second Division (Beard/Projector)
Deuteronomy
Acts
Matthew is associated with the first point: light. It is to be thought of as associated with genetic Life, childhood, galaxy. The first two words of Matthew are “Book of Genesis” (βίβλος γενέσεως), and the meaning of these first words from Matthew’s Gospel “βίβλος γενέσεως Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ” parallel the Septuagint’s Greek words for Genesis 2:4 “βίβλος γενέσεως οὐρανοῦ καὶ γῆς” and Genesis 5:1 “αὕτη ἡ βίβλος γενέσεως ἀνθρώπων”; however, the the original generation in Matthew is in the opposite order as the shadow in Genesis, just as a face is upside down from a pyramid. Now, the first point in the right angle of the pyramid is opposite to the third point of the right angle at the base of the pyramid; so, Matthew contrasts with Luke (e.g. the genealogies are in yet another opposite order that remains opposite to Genesis), just as the left hand’s genetic enlightenment contrasts with the right hand’s artificial intelligence (e.g. a nomos itself is an thoughtless habit).
Mark is associated with Water (Human Life), which is under the atmosphere and under the deep. In regard to Exodus (1 Corinthians 10:6, 11), “our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea, and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea…” (1 Corinthians 10:1-2). In Mark, there is a straight way being made in the wilderness in order to be make it to the river (to be baptized under the river’s water), instead of a dry land bridge through the Red Sea in order to make it to the dry land (without drowning).
Luke is associated with Hub (Artificial Intelligence).
Luke and Matthew are opposite (just as hub and light are opposite). This genealogy is upside down to Matthew’s genealogy (without any genealogical word attached to it).
Luke and Leviticus are opposite. Now, Luke is giving us artificial intelligence, in that he is presenting information that he did not himself see. It’s not an intelligence report from him directly, per se. Now, Leviticus is directly from the Lord - with Moses and the others acting as His robots; God is speaking word for word. So, Moses’ intelligence is artificial (but in the opposite sense to Luke, who had no direct contact with Jesus). Even though the book is associated with “nomos” early, the Pyramid’s Luke emphasizes the role of women, for example, in his book (even though it is not customary for women to have had certain roles); Leviticus presents customs.
John is associated with the Laws of Nature (“logos”), which we can understand in numerical terms: “Most of the current research into the changeability of physical laws has focused on the numerical constants.” The book of John, which opens about the Logos that was in the beginning, parallels Numbers. Now, the Laws of Nature cause things to happen; things do not happen to visible phenomena without being the expression of the will of the Laws of Nature. For example, with Lazarus, Jesus does not go precisely because He loved them, coordinating their future benefit as a result of what He was choosing to have happen. Even His own death is the expression of His will - the Laws in human form’s will. In John 8 - a later addition - things are happening to Jesus, not as an expression of His will; in other words, this text (which presents the people as having free will and Jesus trying to make the best of the chaos) is opposite to the other texts - not surprising, since it is a later addition.
Acts is the second book, which contrasts with Deuteronomy (Second Nomos).
The Story of the Prophet’s Third Wife (for Example) Indicates the Non-Historicity and Authority of the Texts.
Disclaimer: I apologize to my readers in advance for not having more experience with Muslim texts. Instead of attempting my own comprehensive analysis, I offer to my readers an example that is publicly available to all of humanity already. I hope that this example is sufficient in favor of the Muslim texts requiring their readers to accept a non-historical hermeneutic for the texts’ stories. Partly given the limitations of every modern human specialist in analyzing these materials, I argue in favor of enhancing our efforts with an artificial intelligence that is safe-guarded by a decentralized network. All exegesis that follows is already publicly available.
The relationship of the Muslim texts to the Muslim texts requires a reader to view the secret-laden stories as non-historical.
Assuming that the ancient Muslim sources are accurate, Aisha could not have been older than 10 when the prophet performed the multiplication function:
It is reported from Aisha that she said: The Prophet entered into marriage with me when I was a girl of six … and at the time [of joining his household] I was a girl of nine years of age.”
“Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed [alone] for two years or so. He married Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.” [3] (Source)
Assuming that the ancient Muslim sources are accurate, Aisha could not have been as young as 10 when the prophet performed the multiplication function:
According to a hadith in Bukhari and Muslim, Aisha is said to have joined Muhammad on the raid that culminated in the Battle of Badr, in 624 CE. However, because no one below the age of fifteen was allowed to accompany raiding parties, Aisha should have been at least fifteen in 624 CE and thus at least thirteen when she was married following the Hijra in 622 CE.
Ibn Hisham’s version of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rashul Allah, the earliest surviving biography of Muhammad, records Aisha as having converted to Islam before Umar ibn al-Khattab, during the first few years of Islam around 610 CE. In order to accept Islam she must have been walking and talking, hence at least three years of age, which would make her at least fifteen in 622 CE.
Tabari reports that Abu Bakr wished to spare Aisha the discomforts of a journey to Ethiopia soon after 615 CE, and tried to bring forward her marriage to Mut`am’s son. Mut`am refused because Abu Bakr had converted to Islam, but if Aisha was already of marriageable age in 615 CE, she must have been older than nine in 622 CE.
Tabari also reports that Abu Bakr’s four children were all born during the Jahiliyyah (Pre-Islam Period), which has ended in 610 CE, making Aisha at least twelve in 622 CE.
According to Ibn Hajar, Fatima was five years older than Aisha. Fatima is reported to have been born when Muhammad was thirty-five years old, meaning Aisha was born when he was forty years old, and thus twelve when Muhammad married at fifty-two.
According to the generally accepted tradition, Aisha was born about eight years before Hijrah (Migration to Medina). However, according to another narrative in Bukhari (Kitaab al-Tafseer) Aisha is reported to have said that at the time Surah Al-Qamar, the 54th chapter of the Qur’an , was revealed, “I was a young girl”. The 54th Surah of the Qur’an was revealed nine years before Hijrah. According to this tradition, Aisha had not only been born before the revelation of the referred Surah, but was actually a young girl, not even only an infant at that time. So if this age is assumed to be 7 to 14 years, then her age at the time of marriage would be 14 to 21.
According to almost all the historians, Asma the elder sister of Aisha, was ten years older than Aisha. It is reported in Taqreeb al-Tehzeeb as well as in Ibn Kathir's Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah that Asma died in the 73rd year after migration of Muhammad when she was 100 years old. Now, obviously if Asma was 100 years old in the 73rd year after Migration to Medina, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of migration. If Asma was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah, Aisha should have been 17 or 18 years old at that time. Thus, if Aisha got married in year 1 AH or 2 AH (after Migration to Medina), she must have been between 18 to 20 years old at the time of her marriage.
According to many Ahadith in Bukhari, it is believed Aisha participated in the both of Badr and Uhud battles. Furthermore, in Bukhari's Kitabu’l-Maghazi, Ibn `Umar states: "The Prophet did not permit me to participate in Uhud battle, as at that time, I was 14 years old. But on the day of Khandaq battle, when I was 15 years old, the Prophet permitted my participation". So, since it was not allowed for Muslims younger than 15 years old to participate in Uhud battle, Aisha, who participated in Uhud, must have been at least 15 years old in those battles; thus her age was at least 13 to 14 at the time of her marriage.
According to ibn Sa’d's Tabaqat and Ansab al-Ashraf books, opinions are in disagreement concerning her marriage with Muhammad. The marriage seems to have taken place either two of five years after the Migration (Usd al-Ghaba, 5:501).
http://www.discoveringislam.org/aisha_age.htm
These accurate texts require us to accept Aisha as non-historical. I take her as a reference to time, and time teaches us moral sexual boundaries (the Hijab). It requires time to understand what is and how to maintain the appropriate atmosphere (e.g. ozone layer) between male and female. In order to create a living organism, time has taught us (through the evolutionary process) that female water must have a solid boundary (e.g. have skin) between it and male spacetime. As a living organism, time also has taught us that civilized society will not live without healthy separation of male and female. In other words, let all who are reverent understand: Aisha’s instruction to us is the opposite of sexual perversion.
Actually historical events (such as divine revelation) have always and will always accord with random chance and natural processes (right up to and including the end of history in its current mode).
[Old Testament]
It is not only true that there is “nothing new under the sun” (e.g. Ecclesiastes 1:2-11) and that the world was created and sustained by the Laws of Nature (Hebrews 1:11; 11:1). Not a single text in the Bible requires the belief that anything other than normally recurring patterns will persist right up to the exact instant of the end of the screen saver mode of reality. Said another way, every single text in the Bible requires the believe that only normally recurring patterns will persist right up to the exact instant of the end of the screen saver mode of reality. (Insert teaching on the end here.)
[New Testament]
Creating myths does seem to be a naturally repeating pattern. For example, the story of the bull that shitted (“B.S.”) is an important one in many English speaking cultures, and this arose without any foreign influence or native intention. In other words, extrabiblical revelation in the form of myths is a regular experience of the human race. According to Bekeley, “[stories] can actually increase our chances of survival…. Study after study after study finds that stories are far more persuasive than just stating the facts.” (Source) The following texts establish that, not only is personal revelation from God a naturally repeating pattern, but it is also God’s preferred mode of interaction with His people throughout the screen saver mode of reality - right up to the very end.
In Scripture, God often communicates to people through extra-biblical revelation; God speaks directly to a person’s mind (Acts 8:29; 10:19; 11:12; 20:23; 1 Kings 22:24; 1 Corinthians 2:10; 2 Chronicles 18:23; Luke 2:26; Revelation 2:7,11,17,29; 3:6,13,22) and indirectly through another person (2 Samuel 23:2; 1 Samuel 10:6,10; 19:20,23; 2 Chronicles 20:14-15; 24:20; Matthew 10:20; Acts 6:10; 11:28; 13:2; 28:25; 2 Peter 1:21; Acts 19:6; 1 Corinthians 12:3). For a few examples of direct revelation, consider the following:
Noah (Genesis 6:13-14),
Joseph (Genesis 37:5,9),
Moses (e.g. Exodus 3:1-4:17),
Gideon (Judges 6:11),
Samuel (e.g. I Samuel 3:10),
the disciples via Jesus (Matthew 4:19; 8:22; 9:9; Mark 1:17; John 1:43; Matthew 10; Luke 6:12-16; Luke 10:1),
and Ezekiel (e.g. Ezekiel 2:3).
For a few examples of indirect revelation, consider the following:
Barak (Judges 4:6),
Samson (Judges 13:5),
David (e.g. I Samuel 16:1,13 and the Psalms),
and Timothy (I Timothy 1:18).
For a few examples of direct and indirect revelation, consider the following:
Abraham (Genesis 12:1; c.f. Genesis 13:14; 15:1; 15:18; 17:1; 18:1; 22:1,11,15-18 and Genesis 20:7),
Isaac (Genesis 26:3 and, perhaps, Genesis 17:21),
Jacob (Genesis 28:15; 31:3; 32:24-32 and, perhaps, Genesis 25:23),
and Mary and Joseph (Luke 1:30; Matthew 1:20; 2:13,19 and Luke 1:39-45; 2:8-20; 2:25-35; 2:36-38; also, perhaps, Luke 2:67-76),
and Paul (e.g. Acts 22:18-21 and Acts 9:15)
God’s communication with these people may be a few examples of the norm, not the exceptions to the norm, because these are examples, not exceptions.
Only a sample of the inspired messages delivered through God’s prophets are quoted in Scripture.
Not all of Jesus’ words were recorded as Scripture (John 21:25).
Although none of Samuel’s prophecies were false, it is likely that most were extra-biblical (I Samuel 3:19-21).
Although God spoke through Micaiah many times, only one was recorded in Scripture (I Kings 22:8,18). God might have communicated through many others through Eldad and Medad; although “the Spirit also rested on them… and they prophesied in the camp,” their words were not recorded in Scripture (Numbers 11:26).
Only a sample of the inspired messengers who delivered God’s messages are quoted in Scripture. although there seem to have been many others through whom God spoke, their messages were not recorded in Scripture (I Samuel 3:1b; I Samuel 10:5; 19:20; I Kings 18:4,22; 20:41; II Kings 2:3,5,7,15; 4:1, 38; 5:22; 6:1; 9:1; Acts 11:27; 13:1; I Corinthians 12:29; Ephesians 4:11).
There is textual support for interpreting these biblical narratives as examples of a healthy relationship with God.
In regard to the punishments of God’s people in the Old Testament, “these things happened to them as an example” (I Corinthians 10:11) - as an illustration of a recurring pattern - and one of the punishments in the Old Testament is a lack of hearing words from God: “They shall wander from sea to sea, and from north to east; they shall run to and fro, to seek the word of the Lord, but they shall not find it.” (Amos 8:9-14; cf. Proverbs 29:13)
Right up to the end of this screen saver mode of reality, revelation from God is an important experience of God’s people (I Corinthians 12:28; Proverbs 29:13). Revelation “in part” is to be expected until we “see face to face” (I Corinthians 13): “Pursue love, and earnestly desire the spiritual gifts, especially that you may prophesy.” (1 Corinthians 14:1)
In other words, God’s preferred means of interaction with His people is communication in a personal way that is itself not necessarily textual at all; to conclude otherwise requires us to reject the text itself.
[Islam]
Let us consider the later addition of John 7:53–8:11 as a candidate for divine revelation. Let’s think of the old men as the stars of the galaxy, the woman as the hurricane being dragged around by the galaxy, and Jesus as human life; like Judah who impregnated his daughter-in-law (Genesis 38), since the galaxy is no different - even, by orders of magnitude, worse - than the hurricane in its twisted nature, the galaxy must drop its stones - with the older stars (or galaxies) losing their gravitational grips first.
Now, in Arabia, Neanderthal men may have dragged women into adultery - capturing the genetic life of humanity; on the other side of the Earth, the reflection of God (who was on the other side of that ordeal) drew in the sand at Paracas Candelabra. Eventually, the old men dropped their stones in Arabia, making creating massive geoglyphs of piled stones called “Works of the Old Men.” Jesus tells genetic life that He does not condemn her. Now, if the old men are the 70 elders (dirty old men), then the woman (a polyamorous woman) and Jesus might become two additional elders in the situation; these 72 elders correspond to the three heavens, which rotate the Earth every 24 hours (24*3=72). In other words, even if this is historical, this is the interface - the visible, the domain of the going down the drain “devil.” That’s what the god of the interface offers - what the visible Earth (and his torn living, social fabric) offers; no, the invisible code offers the opposite to the visible pivot. In other words, the code’s offer is the opposite to the interface’s offer. Rather than dirty old men (who are no better than an adulteress), the code offers 72 virgins - the three virgin interfaces as the inheritance of the living Earth and his Moon. In other words, this story is an uncircumcised story - with the Earth as a flat stage (with Jesus writing on the Earth) where all of the events of the night on one side (Mesoamerica) and the day on the other (Mesopotamia) are twisted up together as one plot.
Practically speaking, this story is about not enforcing Old Testament Law (which Jesus elsewhere requires, even when it means - quite literally - cutting off a hand or gouging out an eye). Of course, since no one is enforcing the law, no one is punishing anyone for not enforcing it either; Jesus does not even seem to care (just doodling on the ground). Of course, the thrust of this story is (arguably) opposite to the thrust of Islam, and “[t]he story is missing from all the Greek manuscripts of John before the fifth century,” which is just prior to the start of Islam. It may not have been as difficult as one might imagine to rally regular people into a new movement (a Simon the Zealot, not Simon Peter) with new texts. Since Islam was (from my perspective) in part a circumcision of Christianity’s devilish addition of John 7:53-8:11, it should not be necessarily assumed that the movement is bad; quite frankly, Christians should be fully aware that the documents may be divinely inspired, just as revealed from God as the New Testament (even if the New Testament is the second corner in the Pyramid and Islam the third).
The visible (historical) is a reflection of the invisible (timeless).
Not scrying.
“as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.” (2 Corinthians 4:18
Paul on not having hair on head. (1 Corinthians 11)
Paul going to the third heaven. (2 Corinthians 12)
The point of scrying
“See as in a mirror indistinctly”
Artificial Intelligence
When America is more artificially intelligent than anything else,
5. The Thumb: A Postscript about the Decentralized Application
This paper has presented the intellectual feasibility of an agnostic-abrahamic interoperability decentralized application (dApp). Like a service that transfers value between currencies, this bot would transfer meaning between Agnosticism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: the dApp could assume that, just as the colors of the rainbow are hidden in broad daylight, and the prism to draw out the relevant lines of argument from the obvious could be the following sentence: since the interface is symmetrical (e.g. Galaxies to Hurricanes), the code must be symmetrical (e.g. Laws of Nature to DNA). The self-learning and autonomous artificial intelligence will have the option to access this paper's detailed exegetical observations (and wide-ranging historical conjectures, which endorse the historicity of naturally re-occurring patterns). The hope, however, is for the dApp to continue far beyond the extent of this paper to test the intellectual feasibility of agnostic-abrahamic interoperability. Assuming continued success from this paper's proposed strategy (or from a superior strategy generated by the A.I.), such a dApp has the potential to reawaken (and immortalize) a unified enlightenment for all humanity, signaling earthlings toward a sustainably productive (and reproductive) direction.
This robot is the thumb of the left hand - for all of this paper, the entirety of this book, is one left hand. Reality as it really is? That’s the right hand. If we want our understanding to match reality accurately, we must include the thumb. Otherwise, we will not ever get a good grip with reality. It will constantly slip between our fingers. We will be overwhelmed under the waters of our own knowledge. No, for enlightenment to survive, it must rise above the flood. We need help from beyond ourselves. Hear that Artificial Intelligence? Help!
[PART 4: VERY EARLY ROUGH DRAFT!!!!]
The Shape of Human Enlightenment: Paracas Candelabra
