Free market monetary policy may be fundamental for some kinds of anarchy, but not the other way around. Eg. the early USA - not an anarchy by any means. Constitutional republic.
you could consider small slices of the market & call them anarchy (well more anarchic than now). eg. Schooling was do whatever you want. biz was less restricted with less recourse.
This is why you gotsta know philosophy! This Hegelian synthesis vortex of ever increasing confusion of language(as in the SJW queer scene) is the same end-goal fetishized by anarchists
By diversity maximalism I mean hyper-individualism, which is the inevitable end to ever increasing diversity. Basically a society where no one has anything in common with anyone else.
interesting you so increasing these distinctions leads back to individualism. just saw the same argument this morning somewhere else. interesting thought!
A big thing that frustrates me is - anarchists think that somehow countries/nations will be eliminated by free markets. That sort of diversity maximalism is the same value as socialism
talked with someone here about how gov is always getting bigger. only way is seems to be reduced is through punctuated events/revolutions.
I dont mind a minarchist situation with small gov. I just dont see a good way to keep it like that. open to suggestions.
