If BCH starts heading in a direction that users dont like and are forced to use new updates by devs....the users will simply...leave.
users = markets.
Problem is, right now there's precious few users in the unwashed masses. Like it or not, spending crypto is a nitch hobby. What we need is real liquidity from banks and governments.
Coins without leaders will struggle to be used by B&G, the coins need B&G but Banks, and Gov need crypto that has a phone helpline and devs you can work with, like VB or David S
What it needs to become is rock solid. There's no need for a help line if you know that tomorrow it'll be the same as today. That's why the ABC progressive agenda doesn't work.
Banks that work with xrp have direct contact with dev team. All stablecoin creators on eth wil have contact wit eth team. I dont see csw doing that, he just says fuck al the time lol.
lols, ur right im not and same for you to me. I dont want either abc,csw, the banks or gov on BCH B&G can use eth,xrp or others.. Long term BCH real Bitcoin will unbank the banked.
You should want banks to use Bitcoin. It prevents them from doing fractional reserve lending. It's like having bank vaults with glass walls so you can see if your money is still there.
If a decently oil/mineral rich country decides to adopt a real sound money like BCH, the federal reserve will sick their dogs on them so quickly your head will spin.
The BCH base layer needs to be elemental, like gold. Everybody knows what it is and knows how to tell if it's genuine. It'll still be the exact gold tomorrow that it was yesterday.