Create account

Dogeman
replied 2316d
No, a demonetization must occur. It is upon us.
replied 2316d
demonetization is defined as _____?
Dogeman
replied 2316d
Marginalizing cost to zero. Willingness and ability will also marginalize to zero with technological unemployment.
replied 2316d
cost is a function of supply AND demand. if technology increases supply 100x but demand increases 100x (as it historically has) cost will stay the same, no abundance, no post-scarcity.
Dogeman
replied 2316d
History is not a good indicator of the future when exponentials are involved.
replied 2316d
to say we're on an exponential you're using history to predict the future🤔
Dogeman
replied 2316d
It is the pace of change some people just don't grasp. Check into exonomics. Abundance is coming. Are you ready?
replied 2316d
Or you can say were on an exponential and we can still make accurate enough predictions about the future, but this contradicts your claim we can’t project these trends.
Dogeman
replied 2315d
Most experts do not think this way. Most experts use linear progressions when dealing with exponential technologies. Solar is coming faster than any expert has predicted.
replied 2316d
So, if you want to say “because the trend is exponential we cannot follow any trends” how do we follow the exponential trend?
Dogeman
replied 2315d
By being the change, not owning it.
replied 2313d
Not “how do we adapt to the exponential trend” how does the exponential trend provide any predictive power if we are discrediting the ability of trends to predict the future.
replied 2316d
However to construct the exponential trend (and project it into the future, because what else are trends good for?) you have to rely on historical data.
Dogeman
replied 2315d
You can't compare a linear progression to an exponential one.
replied 2313d
You suggested bc of trend A past trends no longer predict the future. Thus trend F will happen. I countered with, if past trends no longer predict the future A doesn’t hold either.
replied 2313d
You say were on an exponential trend and that this trend will continue into the future, A. I’ve said demand increases to match supply and this trend will continue into the future, E.
replied 2313d
Made a graph bc bored.
replied 2316d
You suggested we are increasing (I assume technologically) at an exponential rate and thus we could not rely on historical data to predict the future.
Dogeman
replied 2315d
Yes, when something doubles at .01 to .02 to .04 its deceptive and mimics a linear trend. But disruption comes in eventually and people can't catch up with it.
replied 2316d
Sorry should have explained more earlier but had to run. only point was on the paradox you set up. I suggested looking at historical trends to see if demand matched increasing supply
Dogeman
replied 2316d
Apologies, I did not mean to rant like that.
replied 2316d
Lol no worries enjoyed reading it & learned about exonomics, 200 characters (?) isn’t enough to convey complex ideas with details.
Dogeman
replied 2316d
Tell that to Kodak.
replied 2316d
yes, individuals & individual companies will have a difficult time but the most adaptable system I know is the free market, so seems like the best bet when mass change is predicted.
Dogeman
replied 2316d
We will become an interplanetary species. 3-d printing will allow open source competition for pennies per pound of raw material. Autonomous vehicles will disrupt many sectors.
replied 2316d
on edu depends if we're talking content (yeah will likely or already is free), talking going 2 school (which is really for making connections) likely not free but hope cheaper than now
replied 2316d
agree with these, agree education will become cheap (not free though) I'm a maybe on solar & dont think healthcare will be free (medtech advances are crazy expensive).
Dogeman
replied 2315d
All knowledge will be free. New knowledge is the only real purpose of schooling. Medical will be done by AI. Lower cost and more accurate.
replied 2313d
yes, knowledge is free (maybe already). as it is now, meeting people is another purpose of schooling. who you know is important.
Dogeman
replied 2316d
When linear and centralized, change seems impossible. Disruption and democratization from widely used open source platforms is on the rise.
replied 2316d
By the way, I agree, linear & centralized is slow & we are likely advancing faster than linear. I do not think the change will be sudden (e.g. singularity) nor impossible to deal with.
Dogeman
replied 2316d
Solar will dominate globally within 5 years, in the US within 10. Education and healthcare will be free by the end of the 2030s. Transportation as a service will end car ownership.