More likely it would be the UN that wrote it. Their charter of rights is already pretty solid.
Ok, what if they're given the supreme power you'd like to give them and then then they change it to something that's NOT "pretty solid"? Ever seen Star Wars?
All the nations representatives would have to agree on it. So as long as they all agreed on it it would be fine. Citing Star Wars is just foolish.
So a unanimous vote? lol, what are you smoking? The Empire form Star Wars = universal government who threatens your home with a super-weapon if you don't obey them. 100% appropriate.
This is all drastically oversimplified. It isn't just a one time here is a consitutuoks someone whipped up. Vote yes or have it forced. They would form it together.
On the contrary, the devil is in all the tiny little details that benefit one country and rape others in the name of "greater good" or as the UN calls it "sustainable development"
Yes, and globalization would help prevent those problems.
Globalization is fine. A bureaucracy picking winners and losers is counterproductive to fair global trade. It only props up the monopolies that are responsible for it's existence.
Then dont have a bureaucracy picking winners and losers in trade. Free trade would work better. The less restrictions on the movement of assets the better.
Free trade is part of globalism. Free trade does not mean unsustainable.
Environmentalism is one area that free trade is less important of course.
"Sustainable development" has nothing to do with sustainability. If "free trade" is apart of globalism why doesn't the UN crack down on China?
The UN has no power to crack down on anyone is the reason. The UN is not a global government.
