“After I vet it it is not a theory.” That makes no sense. Anyways provide real proof or or your statements are just conspiracy theory. That’s the point.
I see. Still, conspiracy takes two or more. Whey I said there will be more protective measures in BCH, I was just predicting. Nothing more. Based on the past behavior of the BCH devs.
Yet when I point out that your “prediction” of additional protective measures on BCH is a conspiracy theory not backed up by any fact, you accuse me of “ad hominem” attack :/
A conspiracy theory is the fear of a nonexistent or alleged conspiracy or the unnecessary assumption of conspiracy when other explanations are more probable.
Ok I will take your def of conspiracy theory. Even with that, I disagree. I was just predicting further defensive action in BCH's future, conspiratory or not. I think we can stop here.