A good place to start.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/17/that-scientific-global-warming-consensus-not/#2fdef4c03bb3
I have read a lot of the propaganda against the science. There is nothing behind it. Like that list of "scientists" that don't belive in global warming turns out to be regular people.
It says 9000 phds. Dis you see how the 99% was manipulated? Anyway, ask why the narrative was changed from global warming to climate change.
Those phD's aren't in a relevant field. Their opinions are worthless. Research and data are what matter. It was not a narrative change. Just that it involves more than than warming.
Is it warming or cooling, cant be both.
It can be more complicated then that though. The issue is the excess energy in the system due to an albedo imbalance. The extra energy usually is noticed as more heat, but not always.
