Create account

replied 1998d
Is there a reason why you have to chain the txs for regular use? Couldn’t you use any utxo? But I agree, the child limit is hurting dApps.
replied 1998d
The site tries to use all your UTXOs to get around the issue. Even with mitigations in place, users only have so many UTXOs and this limit still gets hit.
replied 1998d
Could you just automatically make more utxos? Auto-split balance into a bunch of .00001 utxos or something so that it’s way less likely you’ll run out of them.
replied 1997d
Additional mitigations can be put in place, but they require significant dev time and don't fix the root issue.
replied 1998d
Use your influence to get this on the next fork. But I wonder what implications it will have with mempool management and block verification time?
replied 1998d
I've been brining this up for almost a year. It's a miner setting, doesn't need a fork. https://jasonc.me/blog/chained-0-conf-transactions-memo