read what you wrote... "at the beginning" is the key point. It means they should get rewarded for that work (indeed) but not afterwards.
In Capitalism capitalist continually keeps getting rewards which is no longer for work he's done before, its just because he owns the business. He does less work but get rewards anyway
The capitalist deserves to work less after all the effort and investment out in to start the company. They worked harder than an employer is allowed to demand of their employees.
Why should they keep getting rewards when they no longer do any work or do very little of it compared to amount of work done by others? That is not PoW system then, is it?
They own the company. They put in the initial work that got everything going. They hired the workers, and delegated the work. Producing the product is only one type of work.
If they are successful enough to allow the owner to pay others to have work delegated to them, that is a good thing. Often the capitalist is able to move onto bigger matters to expand.
Capitalist could get some rewards even if they do no work because they "run the business" but this should be limited in amount & capitalist should not be taking all of the profits.
When the owner doesnt work, the company often fails, or is sold. The profit is a tiny portion quite often. If the owner make 500 times more than you, but employs 50000 people...
And why should the owner get rewards which is actually way more than 500x then workers when all of thecpro ffits is created by the wotkers and not the owmer? Thats called EXPLOITATION
It isn't all created by the workers alone. The owner may not often be in the factory making the product, they are contributing to the profit. You dont know their role so you dismiss it
Not all companies even have that type of setup. Not all companies are on WallStreet. So are you speaking of small to mid level companies differently than multinationals?
I am talking about SYSTEM that allows all this. Some capitalists are shit some not so shit, some are even good people but system itself doesn't care what capitalist person is like.
Ah, you almost got back to reality. Some people are good, and some bad. The capitalist system helps make sure the bad ones still contribute to society.
Who are you to judge who is deserving? The system of capitalism helps the whole of society to improve though. That is an undeniable fact with the support of all the evidence.
Define who you are talking about when you use the word capitalist. Are you only speaking of investors? Majority share holders? The board? Middle management? This is far to vague.
The capitalists that "do no work" are mostly a myth, or the owners of old established companies, and the owner themself is old, or one who has inherited the company.
Workers who are picking up all of work once business is already established (& capitalist already got his RoE and covered all his costs) should be profiting from their own work also.
The capitalist is often still working. You dont seem to understand that producing the product only matters if the owners have someone wanting to buy that product.
Workers should also be included in all decision making so that capitalist can't just move the business to China etc, leaving lives of the workers in shatters & without income any more.
That is a horrible way to see it all. First most workers fear making decisions. They want a central figurehead to turn to, and to place blame on. One decision maker works best.