Create account

Sk8eM dUb
replied 2325d
"Prove" is an extremely loaded word. Everything we think we know about anything is theoretical. Science = "evedence seems to support the hypothesis". Even Einstein may be wrong.
2 / 23
replied 2325d
It is important to understand the difference between a law and theory. Laws are WHAT happened. Theories are WHY it happened. Laws are provable. Theories are not.
1
546
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2325d
Name one single "law" that's proven.
replied 2324d
Laws are simply observations of phenomena. Gravity is very easily proven. The theories behind WHY it happens, when/where it applies, etc. are not “proven”
replied 2324d
I do not need to study anything to observe that gravity exists. Science is making itself important to create authorities. Mathematics is the only science that is really useful/proven.
replied 2324d
Oh but Physics is mother of all sciences, mathematics is like the language
replied 2323d
Physics is based on Mathematics. How can physics be the mother if it depends on mathematics? Language are letters and words which describe mathematics.
1
replied 2323d
Its other way around, mathematics is language to represent the natural laws, which are laws of Physics.
replied 2323d
Ok I give up you reject logic thinking out of pure stubbornness.
replied 2323d
This is logical thinking, natural law is the rule which is laws of Physics, which is explained with mathematics.
replied 2322d
Child needs mother to be born. Nature doesnt need physics. Mathematics doesnt need physics. Physics needs both of them to exist. There you see who is the mother and who is the child.
replied 2322d
Mathematics is a language... it is used to describe natural laws, which is laws of Physics.
replied 2322d
What? Nature is Physics.
replied 2324d
Mathematics isn't even a science...
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2324d
If every piece of matter in the universe doesn't obey it consistently 100% it's a pretty lousy law. The devil's always in the details! That's why we have magic stuff like dark matter.
replied 2324d
... probably impossible to ever actually observe first hand.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2324d
Exactly. That's why the words "prove" and "law" are just not very helpful. As if the universe obeys the slight electrical impulses in a few groups of atoms on one random planet.
replied 2324d
It's impossible to say that anything will apply to every "piece of matter". The best we can do is define patterns in what we can observe. Many theories involve phenomena that are...
replied 2324d
Most science is not based on observation but on false assumptions and people who believe in books more than in their own ability to think logical. Modern science creates sheeps.
1
555
replied 2324d
I'm genuinely not sure if you are being satirical or not.
1
replied 2325d
Einstein was especially probably wrong. Remember that Einstein didn't do much science. He did a lot of math and thinking, theorizing connections btwn existing scientific laws.
replied 2325d
Probably wrong, but he is still right until proven wrong. Right now, he is very right
replied 2324d
theory of relativity over time (dropping cosmo. constant, grav waves, etc.). He didn't one day think he figured it all out and write a formula/theory which is yet to be proven wrong.
replied 2324d
Einstein was often wrong, even by his own admission. Such is the nature of working on such complex and ultimately abstract theories. For example, he changed numerous aspects of his...


About Privacy Terms Stats