Create account

BitcoinHoarder
replied 2825d
You realize BSV broke BCH transaction record by DOUBLE right?
3 / 22 5
2,101
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2825d
Of course, block propagation isn't a problem on a centralized network. Moron.
3
1,696
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2825d
You mad at me because I’m filthy rich or I’m right? 😆 Miners will come as BSV continues to blow everything out the water. Developers love stable permissionless platform
3
101,722
replied 2823d
OOT: you tipped your own post? That's new! But thank you for leaving me a tip a few hours ago! 🙏
replied 2823d
Nevermind that, seems I got the similar name mixed up!
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2825d
Then why CSW and Charles X are saying SV is permissioned development? Maybe you should listen more carefully to your dear leaders?

-massive facepalm
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2825d
If you misunderstood or don’t get it, follow the massive movement in money, my money 😉
4
1,722
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2825d
Permission protocol CHANGE requires miner vote. permissionless to build ON TOP OF BSV. Businesses have to change back end software to support CTOR. That’s PERMISSION to build app.
2
1,997
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2824d
Which changes do businesses need? CTOR is just order of txs inside a block. And miners are currently voting on all three big Bitcoin chains
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2825d
Finally. Nobody can be this retarded.

-double massive facepalm.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2825d
Secondly to build ON TOP OF SV SHITCOIN one must grant permission to use his patents. Thirdly, if you don't like CTOR which scales massively the real bitcoin as cash, u r free GTFO.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2823d
Great article on why CTOR can not scale.
https://medium.com/@g.andrew.stone/why-abcs-ctor-will-not-scale-8a6c6cf4a441
1
1,000
replied 2823d
OOT: thank you for the tip you left me! 🙏
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2825d
Wrong again. CSW explicitely said development is now permissioned (his own words) which is why they are mining their shitcoin at a loss so they can implement whatever they want.
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2825d
Like I said, if you misunderstood or don’t get it, follow the money, before you lose all of yours.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2825d
Like I said, if you misunderstood or don’t get it, follow the money, before you lose all of yours.
Bunch
replied 2824d
Wrap your head around what "permissioned development", "government friendly" and "miner ID" entail. Then read the whitepaper again, the "trust" parts. It should click at some point
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2823d
Charles X is a communist trying to build a second layer for his master.
SaltySatoshis
replied 2822d
Someone is but hurt ... BSV scales, it’s legal , it’s pure utility for everyone not just some..
1
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2822d
Yes?
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2823d
There is no problem with block propigation if you take out the saboaged code put in by Greg and Amuary.
replied 2825d
They didnt really. Miner transactions dont really count as a stress test. If they didnt promonate through the network then they are irrelevant. The 32MB block was closer to 17-18MB.
1
1DYD9Y8EomqBapvM
replied 2824d
Is there any new code related to the biggest blocks? As I understand it's just miner's node settings, applicable to any Bitcoin chain


About Privacy Terms Stats