Create account

2244d
We cannot allow Craig Wright to destroy Bitcoin Cash.
3 / 19 9
102,233
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2244d
What are we supposed to do about it though? The miners hash decides doesn’t it? Our hands are tied unless we want to risk replay/spliting coins early....? Maybe I’m misunderstood?
3
1,666
replied 2244d
We can choose to use it or not, the people have the power, not Craig or the computers who run his code.
3
666
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2244d
To be honest, doesn’t seem that way. It seems like this whole thing is a giant pissing contest that comes down to who can afford to fund the most mining rigs to “win a hash war”
2
1,000
replied 2244d
We can absolutely fork the hashing algo and then CoinGeek is fucked. Not saying it's optimal but I'm not being ruled by a tyrant and I'm not waiting until these people run out of money
2
1,666
jim
replied 2244d
Fork to SCRYPT now and call yourselves RogerCoin and we won't destroy you... well not until we start renting SCRYPT miners to kill Litecoin and all other SCRYPT shitcoins.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2243d
Ummmm wow talk about dividing the BCH community. I guess their plan is working 😣
3
1,000
replied 2244d
This time next year, Craig Wright will be forgotten just like a back up villain in a D list superhero movie. No one will care. Tick Tock Mr. Wanker!
3
1,666
replied 2244d
Answering your question #3: Do nothing, you'll be fine.
2
1,000
replied 2244d
We can't allow "others" to rule it either. Perhaps this will be a turning point that eventually leads BCH down its true path. Wait & see.
2
4,000
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2244d
It’s the “allow” part that I am confused with. How exactly would one not allow it?
Everything feels out of control. The alternative of “choosing a side” sounds like gambling
1
replied 2243d
CSW is NOT allowing Roger, Jihan & co to have their way with BCH anymore. A very bad situation but very real.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2243d
Sorry I’m an idiot and didn’t link my 3 responses together properly. My 3 posts read backwards now. Sorry. Hope you can still understand I’m trying to say.
1
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2243d
If you sit back and allow the miners duke it out then we are back to the pissing contest of whoever has the most money for mining rigs wins the hash war.
It all seems futile to me.
1
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2243d
Since by choosing one side over the other as a means to “not allow it” then if your wrong in your choice you loose everything. If you hold you allow the miners to duke it out.
1
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2243d
True but that didn’t actually answer my question at all. “We can't allow "others" to rule it either.“ I asked how we would go about not allowing it? Choose/sell a side=gamble.
1
replied 2242d
Wright & BSV are not allowing it by using majority HASH POWER. Roger & Jihan cannot do anything about it except output more hash power that BSV and be allowed to continue their work.
replied 2244d
We can change the hash algo if it gets too out of control.
1
1,000
replied 2244d
What will work for you is the Winnie The Pooh's way:

"I was going to change my shirt but then I changed my mind instead."

Craig is protecting the original Bitcoin. @_opreturn
2
1,546
RufusYoakam
replied 2243d
How is he destroying it, exactly?


About Privacy Terms Stats