And what about the Wikipedia article? Is that too much facts for your little brain to process so you had to dissmiss it?
Actually if you actually read those myths you see how they are far to spread out in time to be talking about the same event. Your own link defeats your argument.
Which one? Because the majority talks about a global wiping flood. Obviously you haven't read them.
At very different times, and with a limited understanding of what the entire world was.
Exactly. Interesting isn't it?
Not really. Rather trivial, and doesnt lead to any interesting conclusions.
Unless you start using your brain.
That is how you see it doesnt support these wild conclusions.
