I have one new perspective since 32MB blocks were mined: could it be that during stress test miners didn't want to mine 32MB blocks so that they can say original code can't scale?
I thought the 32mb blocks were faked???
I think ABC guys are not fully honest
Some do say they were faked, I think they weren't. They say Tx were not broadcast to the network, but looking at TxHighway, I could see all the Tx so I don't know what they're on about
Much conspiracy. Could be wrong but I always thought its computationally ineffective to pack so many transactions in one block since the main mining reward is coming from the coinbase
Do you have proof that miners didn't do that? I know you don't, I also question miners (as everyone else) because they showed to not being able to rely on during BTC scaling debate.
Entirely possible, and you're right I wouldn't know. I'd like to think that everyone works towards maximisation of their own profits
Why would they do that?
This is why I always used to say not to follow people but ideas, and that's what I am doing. Yesterday when BGV mined 5x 32MB blocks told me: maybe ABC do want to change the protocol?
Core introduced some code limiting the software to handle 14 tx/s i think it is. This limitation has been removed.
I was with SV up to that point, only changed my mind because I realised (or thought I did) that stress test showed original code can't even produce 32MB blocks, but we saw BGV do it.
It is possible with the original code. The limitation preventing this was introduced by Core some years ago. ABC has fixed that in the same release that fixed inflation bug.
What Core did, to make us think original code can't scale so that we think it needs to be optimised. But DSV is not optimisation of it, while you can say CTOR is, but DSV is not.
I agree. Personally I'm quite neutral about DSV. Don't know much about it but I heard it can make some nice cross chain things possible.
Personally I would like to see different blockchains talking together.
Not sure I follow...
Core said original code can't scale, they went (completely) diff direction. Stress test didn't produce 32MB blocks, possibly it was intentional so that we think it needs optimisations?
We know DVS is not part of original code, also Bitmain wants Wormhole which is sidechain & its bad because it burns BCH to create WCH. What if CSW wants to prove original can scale?
Either CSW was hired to kill Bitcoin or he's trying to manipulate the market to make a few millions.
I think there's very valid possibility that CSW is trying to teach miners a lesson for being inert, which is what allowed Core to take over BTC, miners could have & should have reacted
For him to make millions he needs working Bitcoin system, right? You think all this hashpower from him & CoinGeek is going to stop mining if they win? Not going to happen.
