Aright I'm with you there. Although there is the so called "fidelity effect" where you want to be able to show bigger buisinesses that this thing isn't going to choke under pressure
and just removing the limits is just a PR, or even outright lie, if one wants to use that as a proof that it won't choke. Software needs optimization, and removing the bottlenecks.
I don't think that's what anyone is claiming. The "remove of the limit" rhetoric acknowledges that miners wont try to propagate a block that has a high probability of getting orphaned.
But is it. I saw many times 'fidelity problem' and rhetoric 'remove the limit to show the chain can scale'. Remove the bottlenecks, that's the way to show haw the chain can scale.
