Create account

replied 2315d
The mute function should only work on a per account basis. The post will still show on the blockchain and as a default until an account mutes that person.
replied 2315d
I'm not trying to be critical but what do you pay #Memo?
replied 2315d
Nobody pays memo, but I want it to be substantial content, not ads and people telling me that Obama fucked my wife and is the antichrist gay lizard jew muslim.
replied 2315d
Loaded question, but what type of content would you like to see? Or what usage would you be looking for?
replied 2315d
Not what I want to see, but what I don't want to see. I just want a way for users to be able to hide/mute content that they don't like. As Memo grows, so will incentive to spam ads.
farsider350
replied 2315d
replied 2315d
You pay to get your post on the blockchain. Right?
replied 2315d
Yes. But not memo.
replied 2315d
Also, who enables #Memo to grow? The reader or the poster?
replied 2315d
We want to encourage new posts on #Memo. More posts = more transactions.
replied 2315d
Ok
replied 2315d
Even if it's a bunch of "$100 = 100 penis enlargement pills, grow your dong 99 inches in 3 hours!" posts?
replied 2315d
Theoretically, if we got 1 million new posts, that is 1 million new transactions on Bitcoin Cash...
replied 2315d
It's about the content.
replied 2315d
There must be an incentive for content creators to add content to the network.
replied 2315d
But at the same time you don't want memo to be filled with penis enlargement pill ad posts. Pretty sure that would stifle growth as well.
replied 2315d
I understand your stance. But, we need to figure out a reasonable balance here. Again, we want more transactions on Bitcoin Cash don't we?
ih8x509
replied 2314d
We want more utility. Transaction count is not an end, just a signal we are doing well.
replied 2314d
Utility will improve as transactions increase. The network effects grow. We need a bigger footprint.