Create account

John_Doe
replied 2283d
People lie. Money talks and bullshit walks. If you question the science you are branded a heretic and all your funding stopped. You lose your job etc. Do your own research.
replied 2283d
yes people lie. thanks for the update. that isn't a good counterargument to fossils gradually change over time (like evolution predicts).
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2283d
There still isn't a good example of one kind of animal gradually changing into another. If there is please show me.
replied 2283d
these skulls look to be slowly changing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2283d
Here you got monkeys turning into other monkeys. I'm looking for a chicken incrementally turning into an elephant or something like that.
replied 2282d
Well youre right, evolution doesn’t make such a prediction. no wonder you haven’t seen any proof. Evolution isn’t a biological philosophers stone, transmuting all living things.
replied 2282d
In bacteria evolution is more of a web because of horizontal gene transfer (bacteria can pick up stray DNA & easily incorporate it even across species).
replied 2282d
& species alive today would not be predicted by evolution to change into one another. Chickens & elephants have a common ancestor that likely looks like neither today.
replied 2282d
Looking through progressively older fossils of each you would expect to find slow changes back to something with the most basic qualities of both.
replied 2282d
Ie you would not expect the ancestor to have a trunk or chicken feet. Could expect multicellular, organs, brain, 4 limbs.
replied 2282d
From quota “The nearest common ancestor of birds and mammals was probably an eight-inch long reptile that lived anywhere between 320 and 340 million years ago.”
replied 2282d
Evolution predicts populations slowly changing over time & branching out as sub populations fill different niches.
replied 2282d
None of these “monkeys” invented the internet so something changed, or evolved.