Create account

BitcoinHoarder
2749d
“Jihan and Bitcoin ABC believe that increasing the blocksize limit will centralize the mining activity because only larger-scale miners will be able to process larger blocks.” Article states. Is it true?
replied 2749d
No, that is certainly NOT true at all. Both ABC and BU has larger blocksize (up to 1 Terabyte) as a goal. But first the software must be able to handle it.
Saturn7
replied 2749d
Sounds like the last 5 years of concern trolling from core.
Miners decide at what pace they want to increase block size. Not Devs. It's in the miners interest.
replied 2748d
Miners decide what to mine, Devs give them the options.
Fnuller15
replied 2749d
No it doesn't. Core/Blockstream does not believe meaningful on-chain scaling is possible at all.
replied 2749d
Pessimistic amateurs, throwing riffle in corn upfront.
When BCH SV shows them ONChain scale, I just hope they will see the reality for once.
replied 2748d
..oh...and who did the majority of the Gigablock tests? That's right, BU.
Stop being so full of shit.
replied 2748d
What a load of crap. Who was it that increased max. blocksize from 1 MB ->8 MB and 8 -> 32 MB? Huh? That's right, that was ABC and BU.
Metalbrushes_Tattoo
replied 2748d
THIS!
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2749d
Also theres the "slow block" attack where a large pool waits a few seconds after finding a block before propagating it to get a head start on the next block.
Sk8eM dUb
replied 2749d
They're trying to prevent "mega block" attacks where a miner distributes a large, complex block that takes a long time to validate giving them extra time to mine the next block.
replied 2748d
Who knows what they believe. But what do they write?
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2749d