Create account

replied 2006d
I cant think of an animal that wouldn't over consume. Animals can eat until the food has run out, then they starve and die. Cats do it a lot. Cats put a lot of animals into extinction.
replied 2006d
That is not over consumption by an animal, there is a natural balance in nature which is what humans have disturbed. No individual animal over consumers... some people do. You get it?
replied 2006d
I get that you have no idea what you are talking about. Animals over consume all the time. Individual animals, and species. Animals can destroy an ecosystem. Look to Australia.
replied 2006d
Let me repeat, ONE ANIMAL DOES NOT OVER CONSUME, species as a whole can, but there is NATURAL BALANCE which makes those animals that eat too much, they die out and balance restores.
replied 2006d
In nature you have no private property, you have no inheritance, you have no money... you are just too stupid I guess, to understand this.
replied 2006d
GPS tracking of wolves in six different packs around Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, which shows how much the wolf packs avoid each other's range
replied 2006d
An animals territory is its private property.
replied 2005d
You and every moron that liked this post, are just too stupid.
replied 2005d
Do you even have a reason to believe that is not the case? You just demand people now to your word? You could try backing up your aim instead of demanding people accept your word.
replied 2005d
You have said plenty of really stupid things, therefore you are stupid. And if some person likes such stupid comments, it means they are stupid also. This is basic logic which you lack
replied 2005d
I've taken basic logic courses. Have you? Do you really think you have used any logic to come to your conclusions?
replied 2006d
I guess it is because I listen to the experts who study animals instead of making bold assumptions as you do.