Or they really don’t understand Bitcoin in principle.
I suspect it's very much both. That's why I'm for more privacy, but still accountability, so it needs to be economic incentive, not identity except at second level.
They let Core win. They really don’t know what they are doing. What is common knowledge for us eludes them. But I’m happy they don’t get it. Let’s me load up on SV.
You do realize that the small BCH community has now been cut in half again,right?That means not only is it going to slo BCH adoption down,but it will be difficult for SV to get started
C'mon man, taking it too far. You've got to know that spouting crazy talk like this just makes it plainly obvious this is not your personal opinion, just what they pay you to say
Again for the douche bag. The definition of Bitcoin is A PEER TO PEER ELECTRONIC CASH SYSTEM. There are many now that are considered bitcoin. The Satoshi Vision is only one way.
To be fair, bitcoin should also be decentralized. SV is 100% centralized under Nchain. Hash rate, development and all the businesses. For me it's the definition of a shitcoin.
Yep that is what they said about BCH a year ago. It's been a year and they have over 500 listings on Marco Coino. That's hardly anything. You will be dead before it happens.
I agree, SV has no front man. I think they are hopping to start with some large solutions that needed a much larger chain to make the idea work. Maybe they can get some huge company