Create account

John_Doe
replied 2280d
They are equally realistic. Lets put a bandaid on but ignore the missing amputated arm. Governments kill people and they have enough usefull idiots to pull triggers.
1 / 44
replied 2280d
equally realistic? Not
John_Doe
replied 2280d
Can you snap your finger and make guns dissapear? If not, equally realistic.
replied 2280d
Tell that to Australia. http://fortune.com/2018/02/20/australia-gun-control-success/
John_Doe
replied 2279d
Tell that to France.
replied 2279d
I'm good in France with a homicide rate per inhabitants 6 times lower than the US. I would say banning gun is working here, at least.
replied 2279d
This is extremely shortsighted. How easily you forget history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_France
replied 2279d
I didn't forget, I actually learnt that in school. The thing is our weaponry tech was really inferior at the time. If they gave a weapon to everyone, we would have lost anyway.
replied 2278d
It has

Your country was taken and then given back by those with guns. Gun control has nothing to with saving lives, it has to with who has guns and who doesn’t. It’s about control
replied 2278d
I don't mind trained military to have guns. You have to be delusional to think civilians with handguns can control any army armed with tanks, drones, etc. Civilians never have control.
replied 2276d
1
546
replied 2276d
Alright, seems fair. Also most of the time when someone wants to protect themselves from police enforcement, the police shoots first. Govt doesn't even need guns to control anyway
replied 2275d
yeah. argument is there but language is a bit strong. true gov controls people by demanding respect (essentially). guns are usually a last resort of force. (after letters, courts...)
John_Doe
replied 2278d
Tell that to the Afghans who kicked ass.
1
replied 2278d
So you don’t mind over 400,000 innocent civilians killed in Iraq and Afghanistan since the US invasion? You only care about the deaths sensationalized by mainstream media?
1
replied 2278d
I care about the deaths that could have been easily avoided. But what's your take on this, should we demilitarize the US ? Or train every iraqi, even children ?
Barricade
replied 2278d
Demilitarize the US is a great idea. After all, the 2nd ammendment protects your land and there's no need to "democratize" foreign countries.
2
replied 2278d
Agree. US isn't a democracy itself, so it can't install one the first place. US installs banana republics under the guise of "democracy".
3
2,069
replied 2278d
They all could have been easily avoided by non-intervension in the first place. If only the American people only had the ability to see through the propaganda and stop fascism.
replied 2278d
West screwed up. We waste our time taking care of idiots who have failed to form a functioning civilization after thousands of year.
3
1,234
replied 2276d
love this image
replied 2278d
"American people" don't choose what war to participate in, even if they see through the propaganda, and their guns won't deter the govt from going. Like the Vietnam war...
replied 2278d
Agree. But guns I homes deters them from declaring war on or own people. Notice the more gun control the more militarized the police become.
1
replied 2277d
I'm sorry but this is not true. In France only the military and special forces carry loaded guns and gendarmes doesn't have any. There are just more men since recent events.
replied 2277d
Yeah hardly looks like military... https://tinyurl.com/ybl6vg4z
replied 2277d
Looks like a parade uniform to me.
1
666
replied 2277d
? This is only for the show.. No policeman walks with this in the street, again, see my previous comment.
replied 2277d
Is this just for show too?
https://static.ladepeche.fr/content/media/image/large/2017/10/18/20171019092126096-0.jpg
replied 2277d
Absolutely not, this is the RAID units, the French SWAT. There's a very low chance to see them in real life. They are only 380 too.. They don't enforce anything.
1
546
replied 2276d
And you believe you are safer country? Than where? https://tinyurl.com/o28a2sf
replied 2277d
Again totally in denial about the fact that France was lost as a country to Germany before being restored by people with guns. Gun control is more about control than anything.
replied 2277d
Our entire army was wiped out by the blitzkrieg in 6 weeks. It has way more to do with our inferior technological progress at the time than giving guns to civilians or not.
replied 2276d
Your just proving my point. Imagine if not just the military but all of the people were armed with modern weaponry.
replied 2276d
Wouldn't stand a chance against tanks and planes. Civilians wouldn't be as coordinated as the military too. They went from Poland to Moscow and everyone had a gun there
Barricade
replied 2276d
The USA lost againts Vietnamese farmers.
2
1,092
replied 2276d
North Vietnam had a lots of military. The US did the most damage by killing 2 million civilians and 600k soldiers. They did not lose the battles at all, it was just unnecessary.
replied 2277d
fascism? Let me guess, you have no idea wtf this word even means.
replied 2277d
I do, but why do you think I don't?
replied 2277d
The way you use it. Context.
John_Doe
replied 2279d
Just dont draw offensive cartoons. Doesn't seem like gun control helps in that case.
replied 2279d
It's not perfect but it helps. I mean we don't have school shooting drills here
John_Doe
replied 2278d
The drills are part of the propaganda. Don't let that fool you. Fact is if someone wants to do a mass shooting they can. Gun control isnt stopping them.
John_Doe
replied 2279d
Just too bad it only improved 8 years after the ban. Low crime before low crime after. Big surprize.
replied 2279d
You must not even be from America if you spell surprise with a Z. LOL. Or is that you Trump? LOL
John_Doe
replied 2279d
Thank you for turning to personal attacks. I rest my case.
2
2,546


About Privacy Terms Stats