Create account

Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2197d
Shill implies i'm being paid. I am not. I give money away.
I simply support the white paper which Bitcoin ABC (a blockstream company) is again trying to subvert.
3 / 90 5
1,777
replied 2196d
How are they subverting the whitepaper?
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
The ABC devs are basically all Blockstream drones.
Bitcoin ABC (Another Blockstream Company)
They laughed at you guys when they came up with that.
1
replied 2196d
do you have a link to this?
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
I sure do.
replied 2196d
i'd like to read it if you're willing to post it.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
1
modulus
replied 2196d
Why aren't the stress test txs replayed on the ABC chain? Nothing substantial has been added to SV to make bigger blocks possible. ABC/BU can handle that too.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
That's what we have been trying to say since 2011. lol
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
Then why did they fork away from larger blocksizes? Because they never plan on increasing the blocksize. You guys get jihans wormhole aka LN.
modulus
replied 2195d
What are you talking about? There's nothing to increase, the blocksize cap is ADJUSTABLE, miners can set it to what ever they want.
1
replied 2196d
How is wormhole anything like LN? Please stop making random parallels between things that have nothing obvious in common. It really doesn't help me understand your point.
replied 2195d
Yep, lightning network was supposed to be for faster transactions. Wormhole is for smart contracts. Bitcoin Faucet is a douche. Every post is FUD.
cbeastsv
replied 2195d
LN and Wormhole are similar in function. LN requires smart contracts, Wormhole supports smart contracts. A perfect fit.
replied 2194d
Wasn't BSV supposed to be turing complete?
cbeastsv
replied 2193d
What's does that have to do with supporting LN?
replied 2194d
More Fud.
replied 2196d
yeah… that’s great and all but doesn’t support your claim that “The ABC devs are basically all Blockstream drones.” http://i.imgur.com/A3oUmxl.gifv
replied 2196d
this one work?
1
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d


How many ABC updates have there been since the fork? 5?
What are you changing? What are you afraid of?
2
replied 2195d
I just want a link to info about ABC being related to blockstream. dont really care which one wins out (obvi own equal number of each)
replied 2195d
Yep the ABC Blockstream comparison is just FUD. it's created by sore losers.
1
bchbtch
replied 2195d
Does the fact that they are overtly acting in the same way mean anything to you? Or is it not real unless it's on a webpage?
replied 2195d
If they are acting in the same way, then why didn't they just stick with BTC?
bchbtch
replied 2195d
I cannot read the minds of the ABC decision makers, I think they are making a mistake.
replied 2195d
Dude. Bitmain is by far biggest crypto company. They own way more BCH than BTC. I think they know what they are doing way more than your opinion. LOL
1
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2195d
Doesn't look like it.
2
replied 2195d
What it looks like is CSW is playing the drums on your ass.
bchbtch
replied 2195d
I trust my own opinion 99% of the time. I'm not always right but I always learn as much as possible.
replied 2195d
Well I give you that. Everybody should trust their own opinion more.
2
2,000
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
Yes it does! Isn't she amazing? 😍
1
replied 2196d
Faketoshi does it again. LOL
replied 2196d
More fud
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
These "software bottlenecks" take weeks to fix and roll out. Not years.
SpaceX built an entire fleet of space ships in less time than it took to deploy segwit.
replied 2196d
This is not an argument. Making and flying a rocket is nothing like deploying a change in a protocol. You are comparing apples to oranges.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
They also created a fake stress test to show they couldn't create 32MB blocks.
But SV just mined a 64MB block and is pumping out 32MB blocks at will.
replied 2196d
I'm not sure about this one as I don't know the details of the test but first of all, one 64MB block doesn't mean much, it needs to show sustained rate. Secondly, some things don't...
replied 2196d
... scale linearly. So just because we can do 33 to 65 doesn't mean that we'll go faster. If you don't parallelize the block verification how will you take advantage of multicore CPUs?
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2195d
Maybe you should read the SV road map.
https://bitcoinsv.io/roadmap/
Q1 2019
3
replied 2194d
Thanks for the link. I did go through it. So SV is planning to add multithreaded verification of blocks. But it doesn't answer how you can handle a stream of 128mb blocks right now.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2194d
Who said anything about a stream? Blocks are produced on average every 10 minutes.
Most decent servers can process 128MB block in about 5 to 10 seconds.
3
replied 2190d
Also, ordering information doesn't grow linearly as the blocks increase in size. So CTOR will be an immense boon for graphene when blocks get huge.
replied 2194d
... it. But if you say that most servers can already handle it then cool. Will they be able to handle it with DSV as well btw? Is it more complex than normal sigverify or same cmplxty?
Nikamoto
replied 2194d
Interested too for dsv. I think it's the same thing but I'm not sure
replied 2189d
It should be the same complexity as normal sig verify but I guess you can put many of them in one TX. Otherwise Ryan's point about DSV being a subsidy doesn't make sense.
homopit
replied 2189d
True, it really doesn't make sense.
replied 2194d
Yeah it's a stream of blocks, one per 10min. Ideally you'd want the median server to be able to *easily* handle processing the blockchain so that people can build services on top of...
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2194d
This network is intended for miners and merchents not people running rasberry pi's.
replied 2195d
So why didn't CSW install the "Original Bitcoin Protocol" in the last update? Shouldn't have that been the first thing they did?
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2195d
What's in the oringal white paper thats not in SV?
1
replied 2195d
That's not answering the question.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
By adding CTOR (jihan patent) and OP codes that are not included in the whitepaper.
Also the next fork will include a "maliablity fix" that is basically another form of segwit.
replied 2196d
The problem with Segwit was never that it fixes transaction malleability. The problem was that it reduced the incentive of miners to witness signatures in order to get the TX fees.
replied 2196d
1)CTOR is not patented. It is a simple sorting order. 2) Mal.fix != Seggregated Witness
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
1) Yes, but ASIC boost which is used to implant CTOR is patented.
2) Any decoupling of the txid from the tx is Segwit. Mal.fix === Seg wit
replied 2196d
CTOR does not have anything todo with ASICBOOST. Mal. fix can be done in several ways.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
ASICBoost is transaction ordering.
CTOR is transaction ordering.
replied 2195d
This is ASICBoost: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/43579/how-does-asicboost-work/43620#43620
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
ASIC Boost is the hardware implmentation of CTOR. They are one and the same.
HERE IS A LINK FOR YOU TO READ: http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin/public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf
replied 2196d
I read it. I don't see any reason why a patent on ASICBOOST would stop someone from using CTOR. Can you explain in more detail?
replied 2196d
More Fud
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
Hey look the retard that posts evey 15 min all day long and is not a shill is BACK! Whoohoooo
replied 2196d
More Fud
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
Septmike you're acting like a bot. You keep posting the same thing over and over again.
replied 2196d
You keep posting fud over and over again.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
But you keep posting every hour 24 hours a day. Do you ever sleep?
You must love roger so much.
replied 2196d
Interesting you have 231 followers and follow no one. Who are you really? You are clearly here just to spread fud.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2196d
I follow the Bitcoin Whitepaper.
1
777
cbeastsv
replied 2196d
Said the sock puppet.
replied 2196d
replied 2196d
And I only have 1365 actions since June. That is dinky compared to some of the people on here.
replied 2196d
You are still making shit up. Go look at my posts, there is at least a 10 hour spread between one post and another post.
replied 2197d
Ok, fair enough. But I suppose you need to project when the 100% centralized 3 SV miner cartel manages to rek their own network with the Satoshi Shitgun, and couldn't bring down ABCs.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2197d
a 2 block reorg happens at least once a month, it's a non issue. It is however making 10 to 32 mb blocks while ABC is making an average of 0 MB blocks.
You have one miner...Jihan
2
replied 2197d
One Miner???? BCH has 6 Mining pools. SV has 4. And Bitcoin.com leads the way, not Antpool. Not sure what you are smoking.
3
546
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
He is smoking CSW's farts.
5
1,092
replied 2197d
LOL...yeah
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2197d
Yeah those are all jihans miners.
1
replied 2197d
Well if you are going to go that route, then the 4 pools on the CSW side are all CSW miners. LOL
1
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
SV have 0 network effect. They shitted on it and put it on fire. Their leadership is arogant, abrasive, divisive. Good luck with any of that.
1
Barricade
replied 2197d
Yes, big blocks with lots of orphans and poor perfomance overall https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9yimel/it_appears_the_bsv_chain_is_currently_being/?utm_content=comments
1
Barricade
replied 2197d
This is the result of big blocks without fixing bottlenecks first.
2
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2197d
SpaceX built a fleet of space ships in the same time it took blockstream to release segwit.
Fixing problems in software takes weeks not years.
2
1,000
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
SpaceX built nice CGI footages.
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2197d
orpahns are a natural occurance on this network. Its up to miners to fix, not devs paid by special interest. Now that miners have control of the software they can make it work
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
You mean Craig?
1
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
Do you think SV will produce 128 mb blocks full of legit transactions by telling everyone to piss off?
1
546
Bitcoin Faucet
replied 2197d
This eco system is not the target audience. This is bigger than what a bunch hobbyist devs on reddit think.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
And what is the target audience you are targeting by telling it to piss off exactly?
1
BitcoinHoarder
replied 2197d
Now 64 MB block by coin geek.
TrashPosterInTheDark
replied 2197d
ABC is not even a company.


About Privacy Terms Stats