I don't think he cares about being competent or strategically successful. He's just using his namespaces (Bitcoin.com, /r/btc, @Bitcoin) to push an agenda to help Bitcoin Cash,
of getting them to cash in to your side if you can convince them they'll profit from doing so or their present situation looks unfavourable. The real problem with Roger
is that he actually believes, almost like a religion, that Bitcoin should strive to be P2P electronic cash for the world as soon as possible through onchain scaling, even if that
means it becomes extremely centralized. We could throw as much money at him as we can, or he could have incentives to be strategically successful, but if that money or strategy
makes his idealogical goals less likely to succeed, he won't ever budge. Best way to deal with such people is to infiltrate their religion (essentially what it is) and cause gradual
disillusionment until their ideology crumbles away, weakening their resolve, and therefore making financial and strategical incentives to behave rationally much stronger.