It is strange to think he is Satoshi despite having very different ideas than what Satoshi wrote? Considering his lack of skills at writing code I dont see how he could be.
We don’t need Satoshi to be alive. He’s already written enough for us to know what he (or she or they) intended for Bitcoin. Join me to bring bitcoin back with BSV Sam!!!
BSV has a weaker scaling plan though. That is why I never supported it. I support BCH because graphene and CTOR will help make a global digital cash better than CSW's plans.
Remember that ETH can theoretically scale to tens of millions, EOS can scale to “infinity”, BCH can scale to GB blocks but what about real life? BSV smokes them all COMBINED
ETH has had acing issues they are dealing with in different ways as they do a lot more tha process transactions. EOS is centralised. BCH roadmap is for TB blocks, and BSV fails.
BSV roadmap is for PB blocks. If you’re a Satoshi hater, can’t discuss Bitcoin with you. If you don’t get reality trumps theoretical feats, don’t have the time to convince you.
It’s not CSWs plan BTW. Aside from that, consider what is happening versus what is promised. BSV cracked BCH transaction record by double already. And no experiments!
It actually didt break the record since the largest block of transmitted transactions was only 18MB, and the rest was transactions the miner included in the block.
I don’t know where you got your information from, but BCH didn’t even get bigger than 8 MB block post fork. So it STILL trumps BCH even considering your information.
Actually during the stress test last summer we saw thigs got tricky with blocks over 20MB. This is why helped highlight the need for the upgrade, and what the bottlenecks were.
I see now. You’re one of those that wants to “protect” miners from big blocks. In that case, youre just slightly better than Blockstream and you will fail as BSV smokes BCH.