“After I vet it it is not a theory.”
That makes no sense.
Anyways provide real proof or or your statements are just conspiracy theory. That’s the point.
I see. Still, conspiracy takes two or more.
Whey I said there will be more protective measures in BCH, I was just predicting. Nothing more. Based on the past behavior of the BCH devs.
Yet when I point out that your “prediction” of additional protective measures on BCH is a conspiracy theory not backed up by any fact, you accuse me of “ad hominem” attack :/
Again, conspiracy takes two or more conspirators.
A conspiracy theory is the fear of a nonexistent or alleged conspiracy or the unnecessary assumption of conspiracy when other explanations are more probable.
Ok I will take your def of conspiracy theory. Even with that, I disagree. I was just predicting further defensive action in BCH's future, conspiratory or not.
I think we can stop here.
No worries. For the record that is Wikipedia’s definition so disagree with Wikipedia definition if you like. 😜
