Nothing on there addresses the bottlenecks we saw during the last few stress tests. Why bump up block size to 128 MB (or at all) when it's clear we can't safely make 32 MB blocks yet?
Why is it taking so long to fix the bottlenecks? It's been 8 months.
8 months since... ? These stress test were in the last few months and were our first real chance to see how the network would practically handle such an influx of transactions.
Yep you are right. I was thinking back to the last upgrade, but the stress test was done in Sept. Brain Fart.
@DashCunning-banned
This guy said what I was trying to say to you but in a much better way.
Questions is why any of the groups aren’t putting full energy into ATMP and block propagation bottlenecks
Your argument dismantles itself, because then you could say we definitely don't need CTOR because it's just premature optimization not needed yet.
When did I make an argument? Or even mention CTOR? Im just asking a question, and pointing out the obvious.
CTOR is a great idea. SV fails because it doesnt implement any kind of transaction ordering. Considering SV is promoted by Blockstream devs it is pretty obvious that SV is hostile.
Only reason CSW hates CTOR is because it's a competing idea to his patents.
That's it, it's all about the money.
And people like you gobbled it up.
Nothing like having the sockpuppers using BCH in Memo
