So when will we see abc.memo.cash be renamed bch.memo.cash ?
Since the split, memo has been nothing but shit now. Just full of trolls. I don't post much anymore.
The percentage of age difference between my father and I fell as well. Does that mean I'm aging faster than he is?
Bad analogy.
Total bullshit. All the hash power supported these changes expect for Calvin's. CSW and Calvin said for a whole 6 months: let's let POW decide. Well, right now BCH has 25% more POW
That means it fell 15% in last 10 days. Pretty much whole december BSV has more hash. Seems more sustainable than Rogers jizz.
ABC & Ver & Jihan & exchanges conspiring to quickly pounce on the BCH-ticker were the bank-of-england
ABC attacked BCH by introducing changes that the vast majority of BCH hash opposed. Then they brought it mercenary hash to push these through. Pretty clear ABC was the attacker.
No, thank you, for being a rare example of someone who can clearly think for himself and make up his own opinion and being respectful. I can always respect that even if we can't agree.
I do though understand your point and why you might think thatbway, but I don't fully agree with it.
I see no conflict in behavior. Anyone can try different experiment. Just don't deceive to be bitcoin while discarding whitepaper, nakamoto concensus and resort to dirty tactics.
So what's your problem again? That frauds shouldn't be challenged on courts if they can be proven?
Firstly it's a third party filling that lawsuit. And its against frauds performed. It has nothing to do with forming concensus. BSV developers sued nobody.
And not an anarchist totally against every form of governments. This is something he never ever stated nowhere and is added to his persona maliciously and dishonestly.
Have you ever even read the article mentioned in the coinbase? Its talking about threats to nationalise banks if they don't submit. Satoshi was against governments abusing money.
Fund me a post of Satoshi where he talks against banks and governments and come back to me.
That's kinda ironic coming from someone discarding nakamoto concensus and resorting to automatic savepoints by shitlords.
Btw nobody calls federal government's to define consensus.
Still salty that we preempted your (SV cabal) incompetent attack, I see.
You probably think you're the first to come up with idea of automatic savepoints. You just exposed ABC to additional attack vectors which will be exploited when pain will be strongest.
Who are you talking to? Godspeed on your "serious" business. But that has nothing to do with the fact that BSV is the polar opposite of what most people understand Satoshi intended
So what satoshi intended?
The Fivebucks BSV transition is complete.
- 0-conf payments are much faster (thanks to MB)
- All user balances were converted to BSV
- Withdrawals are active
Yeah! Great Job!
The Fivebucks BSV transition is complete.
- 0-conf payments are much faster (thanks to MB)
- All user balances were converted to BSV
- Withdrawals are active
Divide and conquer is really splitting something in 2, but crypto has been shattered into a thousand little sub-groups, so I thought the classic foreign take-over technique was apropos
I mean, I agree. Is just that this word I encounter so rarely lately. I heard first time this word in a small hotel in Tehran from Sweedish gay and Belgian feminist. Go figure.
Yeah we'll see how committed to Balkanizing(read killing) crypto the Chinese government/world bank types are. It's possible they'll just discard Jihan and move on to the next strategy.
Balkanizing is still a word?
"Coingeek and BMG are buying BSV and selling BCH. So far, imaginary_uname and I have found 28k BCH that they moved on 12/6 at around 2:45pm, presumably to exchanges to sell.
Renting buyers will be harder than renting hash
"Coingeek and BMG are buying BSV and selling BCH. So far, imaginary_uname and I have found 28k BCH that they moved on 12/6 at around 2:45pm, presumably to exchanges to sell.
:large
